You are doing the misleading. Even Polarik admits the seal was there.
Bwahahaha ... lying by misdirecting is just as pernicious with you obamanoids. There were three distinct, different images posted successively at the obama website. The first was lacking any distortion to the green hatch pattern of the page because there was not raised seal on the thing used to generate the image. There second image had a raised seal added to the first image. The third image is the one factcheck was allowed to ‘handle’ and it had fold lines and a raised seal. By ignoring the first and second frauds your messiah tried to float and pointing only to the third, perhaps you hope people will lose sight of the frauds of the first two images your nasty little affirmative action messiah tried. But some are paying attention to you and your little anti-American army.
This obamanoid troll brought you up trying to use you as his verification source but without pinging you. Aside fromt he nasty little trend his ilk has started (curiosity tried to do the same with me the other day) for confusion sake, is there any use in arguing with liars who purposely misuse the images which have shown up on the Internet? I am certain you would not have said the first image included a raised seal because the image had zero distortion tot eh hatch marking of the paper form which would have been evident if a punch seal had been on the bakc side, as the second image shows the exact distortions to which I refer. Just thought I would ping you to the latest obama liars’ club efforts.