[jamese777]

Nice try, but no ceegar. There was no raised seal on the backside of the exhibit first posted at fightthesmears. It was added to the first image they tried to float, then re-exhibited. If there had been a raised seal on the backside where the supposed date was bleeding through to the front side, the green hatchmarks on the front side of the image would have been distorted as they were in the secxond image... and they are in the second image the liars posted at fight the smears along with an artifact that shows up in both one and two, which will be brought out in court if it ever gets that far. But that was a nice try to confuse and mislead the forum.

---

Here is exactly what was posted on the Fight the Smears website. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BarackObamaCertificationOfLiveBirthHawaii.jpg

One more time for the slow reading group, the raised seal is on the back side of the document and the Director of Communications for the Hawaii state Health Department confirmed EXACTLY what I said. I quote her once again: “It’s a valid Hawaii state birth certificate...”
Okubo went on to say to the St. Petersburg Times’ Politifact: “The Hawaii Department of Health receives about a dozen e-mail inquiries a day about Obama’s birth certificate, spokesman Okubo said.

I guess the big issue that’s being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature,” Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. “Because they scanned the front … you wouldn’t see those things.”

Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.”

---

So dear heart don’t try to kill the messenger. Your argument is with Janice Okubo of the Hawaii Health Department, not with me.

I would encourage Mark Bennett, the Republican Attorney General of the State of Hawaii to seek a subpoena for the original Obama birth document, convene a grand jury investigation and have experts examine the document and testify to its authenticity under oath. Thus far General Bennett has not seen fit to take those steps to resolve the issue.

[MHGinTN]

Still trying to deceive ... what happends to your lie when someone posts a valid, genuine CoLB from Hawaii which has the raised seal on the back yet it distorts the image of the green hatch markings of the form on the front side? ... Get back on the short bus and return to your usual haunts, obamanoid liar. Your deceptions get more involved, byut they are still just lies.

[MHGinTN]

By the way, pitiful troll, here's a genuine CoLB which also shows 'Amended' on the front. Notice how the raised seal which is on the back, leaves a pattern on the front. If you knew anything about a notary's seal you would know why the front gets distorted when a punch seal is administered. But then your continued deceit would be useless, eh? Bwahahahaha and if you magnify your specious image from the aiding and abetting site you will notice there is no raised seal because there is no distortion to the front side of the exhibited document. You can see the distortion on the subsdequent images your marxist messiah used for his 'boney' fides. Go take a look, fool. We all know you're game.