Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InterceptPoint
It’s been way too long ago.

That's a drag. Well, let me counter with my own anecdotal evidence : every doctor I know is getting vaccinated.

The nurse’s basic argument was that the doctor’s felt that the risk from flu shots exceeded the benefits. But it was to the doctor’s advantage to have the staff get shots.

That doesn't make sense. Why would the doctors want their staff incapacitated by this highly "dangerous" vaccine?

The logic of this nurse smells a bit like Limburger.
31 posted on 09/29/2009 7:33:14 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: mysterio
That doesn't make sense. Why would the doctors want their staff incapacitated by this highly "dangerous" vaccine?

That wasn't the issue. Of course they wouldn't. The chances of being incapacitated are/were very small but not zero. So having the staff stay free of a flu would be a "good decision" for the doctors. The risk of them catching the flu would be reduced and the risk from taking a flu shot would be zero. There are some bad side effects from flu shots and the doctors seemed to understand that - at least for the case in question.

I'm not defending the nurse's position. I'm just reporting what she said and I believe that she was sincere. As you can see from the news, people to object to being told they have to take a flu shot.

35 posted on 09/29/2009 7:51:16 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson