Whoopi Goldberg, Child Advocate … But It’s Not “RAPE Rape”

http://www.radioviceonline.com ^ | October 1, 2009 | Steve McCough

[Biggirl]

Whoopi, I have a question for you: Have you ever heard of the words STATUTORY RAPE?

You may see this come up over the next day or so. You may have heard about Whoopi Goldberg’s assertion that Roman Polanski did not commit RAPE rape, whatever… But Toys r Us has a circular that defines Goldberg as a child advocate. As a reminder, here is the video from The View yesterday. Goldberg wanted to get the facts straight, which is understandable, but come on … does it seem to you that the Hollywood elite and Europe’s upper-class are trying to justify or re-define what Polanski did?

[Long Island Pete]

And OJ and Robert Blake got off because it wasnt murder, murder.

[Travis McGee]

I guess drugging a 13 year old and raping her three ways while she cried NO! isn’t “rape-rape” to that genius Whoopi.

Whoopi, what exactly WOULD be “rape-rape?”

[reagan_fanatic]

For Whoopi, it’s never been a question of brains brains, since hers apparently has been starved of oxygen oxygen for some time now.

[Mercat]

Didn’t she brag sometime ago about getting seven abortions? I despise the woman. Some one had a number at Toys R Us to call. I forget where I saw that.

[LeavingNewYork]

Goldberg is pathetic. We bought a Looney Tunes DVD a while back, and as a service to the chidren who would watch had Whoopi explaining to the the kiddies why some of the cartoons were PC, and not acceptable in today’s society. In Whoopi’s world Speedy Gonzalez is bad but a ‘not a rape rape’ of a thirteen year old is okay.
Typical liberal.

[Dumpster Baby]

You can take the Whoopi out of the ghetto, but you can’t take the ghetto out of the Whoopi.

[GOPJ]

I wonder how Whoopi would feel if the President of Halliberton drugged and raped the 13 year old daughter of President Obama... I suspect she would find that a crime - as would all of us. Conservatives see crimes against the innocent as the same - we don't care if the rapist is rich or talented or not.

How much money the rapists has matters to Whoopi - and that's sick.

Liberals feel that a crime isn't a crime if a liberal elite does it to someone less powerful.

We don't agree.

It doesn't matter if the child rapist is living in a double wide and his victim is named "Jessica" or if the child is a guest in a more expensive crime scene.

It's still a crime.

[libs_kma]

I'd like to see that defense used in court.

Idiot liberals never cease to amaze me.

[Biggirl]

This is why I see a GROWING ANGRY BACKLASH against both the elites of D.C. and Hollywood and no amount of going for the 2016 summer olympic games in Chicago or anything else for that matter is going to COOL this JUST ANGER.

[Spok]

Would it be ‘rape-rape’ if Polanski was a priest?

[paulycy]

Would it be ‘rape-rape’ if Polanski was a priest?

That's exactly what I was wondering.

Is there footage of Whoopsie during the priest scandal? How judgmental was she then?

[marstegreg]

Rape-rape is twice as bad.

[GOPJ]

I wonder how Whoopi would feel if the President of Halliberton drugged and raped the 13 year old niece of Oprah of ...( I'm changing this because the President's children should be off limits even as an example ) Whoopi would find that a crime. So would conservatives. The difference is we see the rape and drugging of ANY child as a crime.

Whoopi feels the standard for the "talented" or rich should be different. That's offensive.

Conservatives see crimes against the innocent as the same. How much money the rapists has doesn't matter.

Rape is rape.

It doesn't matter if the child rapist is living in a double wide and his victim is named "Jessica" or if the child is a guest in a more expensive crime scene.

[SuperSonic]

Excerpts from victim's 1977 grand jury testimony in Roman Polanski child rape case

[GatorGirl]

It was definitely RAPE, and not just “statutory”. He sodomized the child.

Sickening, sickening stuff! The Left is beyond stupid. They are criminal and dangerous to take the positions they do.

[fredhead]

Whoppi was right. It wasn’t a rape-rape. It was a rape-rape-rape. /sarc

[MrB]

Seriously, the “liberal elites” DO see themselves as “nobility” subject to different rules than the peasants.

We threw off this mentality once in the history of our country. Looks like it’s time to do it again.

Will they back off and change their minds and attitudes after a political ass-whoopin? Or will lampposts have to be decorated in order for them to get the idea that “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States”.

[SJSAMPLE]

It wasn’t even “statutory” rape.
By all accounts, he plied the girl (13) with alcohol and drugs, and then sodomized her after she repeatedly said, “no”.

[webschooner]

I can watch most Libtard actors/actresses in movies — since 90+% of them are Libs, I just don’t concern myself with it if there is a movie I want to watch. I just never watch any of them give their opinions on TV shows, because I don’t give a damn what they think.

But there are just a few, and Whoopeee is one of them, that I cannot stand to watch. If I am surfing the movie channels on satellite, and I see her name in a movie, I just move on. I just cannot stand her. She is a reprobate.