Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did apes descend from us? (first evos say we descended from apes, now say other way around...LOL!!!)
The Star ^ | October 1, 2009 | Joseph Hall

Posted on 10/02/2009 11:00:06 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: ColdWater

The sheer babbling idiocy the Temple of Darwin has been reduced to speaks for itself ;o)


21 posted on 10/02/2009 11:13:44 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

How would that work, exactly? I mean, the hippies tried this in the ‘60s, but most of them can still talk. Sort of.


22 posted on 10/02/2009 11:14:26 AM PDT by Jagman (I love that the FR spell checker doesn't recognize Obama's name!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

This evolution stuff is still happening. I have this brother-in-law . . .


23 posted on 10/02/2009 11:14:53 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The sheer babbling idiocy the Temple of Darwin has been reduced to speaks for itself ;o)

But the evolution of you into a pro-evolutionist has to be an example of macro-evolution!

24 posted on 10/02/2009 11:14:55 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

If you look into the evo-religious assumptions that go into Temple of Darwin dating methods, you will find that they are just as subjective as their human evolution fairytale.


25 posted on 10/02/2009 11:16:29 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

==Sort of.

LOL!


26 posted on 10/02/2009 11:17:15 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; All

One massive slapdown was not enough for you today?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2353460/posts


27 posted on 10/02/2009 11:19:58 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
That is because you know something about the subject and are therefore NOT the Creationists target audience.

The more educated one is, especially in science, the less likely they are to be a Creationist.

It is obvious that Creationist sources know this and thus play to their audience.

28 posted on 10/02/2009 11:20:02 AM PDT by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

What can I say, it’s hard to resist smacking the Temple of Darwin down when they make it so easy...LOL!


29 posted on 10/02/2009 11:23:33 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
If you look into the evo-religious assumptions that go into Temple of Darwin dating methods, you will find that they are just as subjective as their human evolution fairytale.

I take it you have made yourself an expert on this. Please enlighten the readers.

30 posted on 10/02/2009 11:24:14 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

If that is really what you think you did, that you have far bigger problems in your life than just being a “YEC”


31 posted on 10/02/2009 11:25:45 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

These “scientists” survive on grant money, which doesn’t come in when or if a large amount of time and sum of money invested doesn’t result in a “break-through”. Ergo, Ardi is a scientific break-through. It will be interesting to see the paleo-anthropoligist community respond to this over the next few months. These guys/gals have tremendous egos and hate to see their current and prevailing theories edged out.


32 posted on 10/02/2009 11:25:52 AM PDT by downtownconservative (As Obama lies, liberty dies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
You can't have it both ways

Don't hold your breath waiting for GGG to answer that. He refuses to do so.

33 posted on 10/02/2009 11:27:55 AM PDT by gdani (I just want to be left on this block of ice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: babygene

“the offspring of Tarzan and Jane”

Tarzan, Cheetah the chimp and a fast spotted cat had
contest to determine who would be king of the jungle.

Tarzan would swing from vines, the chimp, from branch to branch and the chee-
screw this


34 posted on 10/02/2009 11:31:51 AM PDT by tumblindice (Give me your lunch money, you racist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; All
==I take it you have made yourself an expert on this. Please enlighten the readers.

Radiometric Dating Questions and Answers


What is radiocarbon dating? Is it accurate?

Are there examples of inaccurate results obtained from the potassium/argon dating method (the most cited method)?

How can the radiometric dates of millions and billions of years old be so wrong?

Is there any evidence that radioactive decay rate might not have been constant?

What is the current creationist thinking on radiohalos (formerly called ‘pleochroic halos’)?


35 posted on 10/02/2009 11:33:00 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

That’s because biblical creation is not a problem, except, of course, to rabid Temple of Darwin fanatics such as yourself :o(


36 posted on 10/02/2009 11:34:41 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

What do Zera and Cornelius have to say about this?


37 posted on 10/02/2009 11:39:52 AM PDT by AnnGora (As a result of the Stimulus Bill, Napoleon has no more tots to give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

There are approx. 120,000 ‘temples’ on planet earth, not a single one has “Darwin” posted over the door.

When you find one... let me know, otherwise, keep your pitiful insults to yourself.


38 posted on 10/02/2009 11:45:01 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I mean...these darwinists??????????

No creation.....but, all this matter from an infinitesimally small point that was held together by gravity, the weak force for crying out loud, when a disturbance unleash in a big bang and viola’....here we are.

And they think we are silly in our faith in a God that created everything........BAWHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

God is not mocked, he will take the crafty in their own craftiness.

Time will end, and the truth of God will prevail.

39 posted on 10/02/2009 11:45:55 AM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Puckster

But the time of God is infinite, and the mind of man is small, as you just proved so beautifully.


40 posted on 10/02/2009 11:48:33 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson