Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
Read your articles -- skimmed the first one, read the second and third. Talk about paranoia time.

Re the alleged Gorbachev Institute meeting about "trash people" needing to be eliminated, I've read the same thing supposedly attributed to the Bilderbergers. "Everybody wants us dead, dead, dead!" I somehow doubt anyone of Baroness Thatcher's stature would lend her name to any sort of enterprise as that.

Remember, PM Thatcher supposedly got pushed out of leadership of the Conservative Party because she wouldn't kowtow to the Bilderbergers' demand for currency union with the EU, which would have meant the end of sterling and an important attribute of British Crown sovereignty. Thatcher said no, and (supposedly) the Bilderbergers then solicited a dog that'd eat a dog within the Tory Party to move her out.

So we are asked to believe that Maggie Thatcher, who scrupled at concessions of Crown sovereignty, would go along with the planned destruction of most of the British people? Please. That is an awfully thick, gristly steak we are asked to choke down.

44 posted on 10/07/2009 1:33:23 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
To finish my thought, which I didn't quite:

a. The reference to the Gorbachev group's plans for megacide tends to throw a shadow over both the veracity of the information referred to, and therefore the authenticity of the speech as transcribed.

b. Therefore, corroboration of the third linked speech is very much needed, particularly given its grim and galvanizing implications, if true. It is a documentation of megalomania and monstrously mega-murderous intentions toward the People of the United States, IF (as you say) the third speech is genuine. The incorporation by reference of a ghastly plot by the Gorbachev Foundation seminar participants makes it less likely that the third speech is genuine.

45 posted on 10/07/2009 2:29:58 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: lentulusgracchus
Yes, I understand that: but this looked like a political speech for party toffs that the Chinese guy was giving. It may be he was echoing the Central Party's paranoia / xenophobia in the midst of things, too.

Politics is a strange amalgam of fear, hope, cynicism, and bluff, with a goodly measure of lies thrown in, whose composition changes according to the audience and the situation.

Cheers!

46 posted on 10/07/2009 3:47:25 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson