Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Birth Cert Case Belongs in Judicial Branch & Eligibility Issues CAN be Decided AFTER Election!
Arkansas Supreme Court ^ | October 11, 2007 | Arkansas Supreme Court

Posted on 10/06/2009 5:03:58 PM PDT by CJacobs

GARY ZOLLIECOFFER, APPELLANT, VS. VERONICA POST, APPELLEE

(Excerpt) Read more at courts.state.ar.us ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birth; birthcertificate; birthers; certificate; certifigate; election
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: CJacobs

bkmk


21 posted on 10/06/2009 5:52:19 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genflag

True, Altus DOES have great wines. Last count I took, Altus has five wineries. My preference is the Post wines, although Wiederkehr is probably the most well known.

Nationally, though, Altus isn’t known for the wines as much as the TV show.


22 posted on 10/06/2009 5:53:38 PM PDT by CJacobs (From the Ozark / Clarksville area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

LOL


23 posted on 10/06/2009 6:08:20 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
Well, it smacks down the argument that the courts have said about all the cases so far are thrown out because there is not precedent cases for them to rely on.
24 posted on 10/06/2009 6:08:28 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
" Upon learning that the Constitution requires a president to be a natural born citizen, a college student said: “What makes a natural born citizen any more qualified than one born by C-section?” "

Yup, the quality of our present liberal educational system keeps on giving ... SARCASM ...
25 posted on 10/06/2009 6:17:42 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
Not to justify the ignorance of the person you cited, but you might want to read Shakespeare's MacBeth, particularly Act V. In this portion of the play, MacDuff uses not being natural born to his advantage and MacBeth's distinct disadvantage...

While such is not particularly germane to the point you were making vis-a-vis the definition of the term in the US Constitution, it is still an interesting thought... A usurper to national power destroyed by someone who was not natural born.

In the current situation, might not we potentially wind up with a usurper to national power who was not natural born being destroyed by one who was natural born?... Perhaps, Keyes?...
26 posted on 10/06/2009 6:22:44 PM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zipper
Didn't "marine" Judge Carter say there is "no precedent" to the Orly/Kreep case yesterday? Any legal beagles here besides any stinking O ZOT trolls who know nothing about the law? I would think you can use state law in a Fed case if there is "no precendent." Particularly when it when to the state supreme court. Nice find. Someone needs to send it to Leo Donofrio on his blog and Gary Kreep. Also Mario Apuzzo and Berg on their web sites. Great great find.
27 posted on 10/06/2009 6:31:28 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lucky Dog

I like Allan Keyes. It would be wonderful if his case took the usurper down.


28 posted on 10/06/2009 6:33:41 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
If I'm understanding this correctly, the action we need to file against the Kenyan Clown is "quo warranto", and the case MUST be filed in Washington, DC:

Chapter 35§ 16-3501 Persons against whom issued; civil action.

A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.


I am not a lawyer by any means, but I would imagine that the "rub" here is that the plaintiffs have the burden of proof, and unless discovery is granted there basically is no (with the exception of Lucas Smith's Kenyan BC) proof to back up the contention of usurpation. We can only hope and pray that discovery is ordered at some point, somewhere, so that this can move forward.


29 posted on 10/06/2009 6:39:00 PM PDT by thecraw (God allows evil...God allowed Hussein...Lord willing he'll give us Sarah to clean up the huge mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
I hope this can be used, but what is a minor felony?
30 posted on 10/06/2009 6:43:54 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky Dog
I will make it my duty to read that part of MacBeth.

Keyes willing to stand up against Obama and demand he proves eligibility has endeared him to me. My husband voted for Keyes. I thought silly, you threw your vote away. Now I see Keyes as my husband does. He is admirable in the face of what I see as corruption. Keyes had my husbands values. I hate to admit it when my husband is right.

So yeah, who better to have standing than someone who ran opposing Obama on a senate seat and POTUS? If Obama is proven to have filed fraudulently, his senate seat is on the block too.

31 posted on 10/06/2009 6:44:56 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

What I meant by a “minor” felony, was that it wasn’t something that couldn’t have been expunged from the record. I don’t remember what the crime was off hand. It was something like larceny. If I recall correctly, Zolliecoffer was with a couple of other guys who committed the crime. Zolliecoffer was a willing participant, but not the major player in the crime. It was a juvenile offense that COULD have (and most likely would have) been expunged from the record.


32 posted on 10/06/2009 6:51:24 PM PDT by CJacobs (From the Ozark / Clarksville area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

It’s precedent OK when there is no Federal precedent.


33 posted on 10/06/2009 6:52:20 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

This is about a Mayor in Arkansas.

It’s got nothing to do with the election of a US President, which operates under unique rules specified in the US Constitution itself.


34 posted on 10/06/2009 6:52:30 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

It mentiosn quo warranto!

Get this to Orly, Kreep, Leo, Berg, Apuzzo and any other attorneys.

Orly was right when she said they could do quo in CA.

Great find!!

Ping this one far and wide.


35 posted on 10/06/2009 6:53:26 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice; Frantzie
I could not help but make the connection after you mentioned the natural born phrase (in Shakespeare's MacDuff case, not born of woman) and the Caesarian confusion.

However, I would not have you think me ignorant of the term, natural born, as it was intended in the Constitution. I do know the founders never meant for that term to have anything to do with the way Shakespeare was using not born of woman and its opposite (being natural born). Nonetheless, the contrasting parallel struck me as a novelty tickling the mind on which to comment.

Should Keyes prevail against the odds and get Obama unseated as being unqualified, the irony would be rich.
36 posted on 10/06/2009 7:00:58 PM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

Very excellent find!


37 posted on 10/06/2009 7:02:41 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
PLEASE send this to Leo Donofrio at http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com. He will be very interested.
38 posted on 10/06/2009 7:05:58 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Wrong. Wow you really do not know your law.


39 posted on 10/06/2009 7:07:39 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
It mentions quo warranto!

-snip-

The parties stipulated that Zolliecoffer obtained the most votes. The petition filed by Post did not institute a post-election contest under section 7-5-801. As we noted in Pederson, supra, the circuit court was without jurisdiction to hear a post-election challenge to eligibility, and the remedy for usurpation of office lies with the state under quo warranto. See Pederson, supra.

IMBER, J., not participating.

40 posted on 10/06/2009 7:07:54 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson