Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stockpirate

My first thought as well: they didn’t bother to differentiate between legal carriers and criminals or it would have disproved their assumptions!


62 posted on 10/07/2009 4:33:04 PM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLib
“My first thought as well: they didn't’t bother to differentiate between legal carriers and criminals or it would have disproved their assumptions!”

BINGO! Great minds think alike. I chased down this study and read most of their boring statistical analysis.

I could not find anywhere that they cared whether the guns were LEGAL or not. Some gang banger with a gun buying drugs from another gang banger with a gun in downtown Philly doesn't mean anything to me as I would never be kind that situation. Not even HALF of that situation.

from their study:

“It is also worth noting that our findings are possibly” (POSSIBLY?) “not generalizable to non-urban areas whose gun injury risks can be significantly different than those of urban centers like Philadelphia

NO KIDDING Sherlock.

This study is totally meaningless unless you are an unemployed, low life, Black, drug user or boozer, living in a bad neighborhood in downtown Philly. Unless those statistics apply to you, this study doesn't.

If you are interested download the PDF at http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=dennis_culhane

78 posted on 10/07/2009 6:46:41 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson