Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Media_never_lie

Great man and a patriot (back ten, states’s rights were assumed to be a valid political theory)-but what was he thinking at Gettysburgh?


12 posted on 10/11/2009 4:16:04 PM PDT by MattinNJ (Palin-I cannot spare this woman. She fights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MattinNJ

At Gettysburg, he did not know what he faced. The calvary was not available to him to report where the Union Army was and which portions he faced. There were also two new corps under new corps commanders.


17 posted on 10/11/2009 4:27:55 PM PDT by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: MattinNJ

“(back ten, states’s rights were assumed to be a valid political theory)”

According to the Constitution it still is.

Elitist, statist, Democrats and other liberals have been working hard to eradicate it but the individual rights of soverign states is still in the Constitution for all to read.


20 posted on 10/11/2009 4:32:15 PM PDT by SeaWolf (Orwell must have foreseen the 21st Century US Congress when he wrote 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: MattinNJ

I think he loved his state of Virginia above all. I read once that he was trying to keep the fighting out of Virginia the summer of Gettysburg so that Virginians could grow their crops so desperately needed. Also read he was suffering severe angina during the Battle, that he wrote about feeling disconnected from what was happening, giving nonspecific orders to his generals. I think he was a great man.


40 posted on 10/11/2009 6:13:04 PM PDT by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson