Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orly Taitz Gets Joy Behar Very Nervous About the Obama Eligibility Case (Video)
You Tube ^ | 10/14/2009 | Joy Behar Interviews Orly Taitz

Posted on 10/14/2009 7:40:10 AM PDT by kellynla

Orly Taitz gets Joy Behar very nervous about the Obama Eligibility case.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attackbyromneybots; birthcertificate; birtherhilarity; birthers; certifigate; conspiracytheory; crackpot; crank; eligibility; joybehar; joydivision; joyless; notbreakingnews; nutcase; obama; orlytaitz; romney; romney4obama; romneyantigop; romneybotantigop; romneybotobstruction; romneybotsattack; ruderomney; ruderomneybots; stenchofromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-469 next last
To: plenipotentiary; Sibre Fan

Yes - I think that is an important point. And found that reference as well.

I am working my way through Sibre Fan’s evidence that makes him believe that the framers did not use Vattel’s definition of Natural Born Citizen as the requirement for President and Vice President.

IT appears that there has been a slow replacement of Vattel’s Natural law that the founders relied on with more of a Blackstone framework.

The Fourteenth Amendment did not surplant or modify the meaning of Natural Born Citizen. And I do not see that any other case did either. But I am still reading and digesting and absorbing the thoughts.

I am not sure what they teach in Law School but the responses that we get from educated lawyers (for the most part) seems to be a robotic action. “There are only two types of citizens Natural Born and Naturalized.” Like this was ingrained in them. Liberals tend to do that and liberals control the education process.

Unfortunately, as soon as the Constitution was penned people were trying to tear it down.


441 posted on 10/15/2009 5:51:24 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Like proof of foreign birth. Absent that I have to accept that Obama is a natural-born citizen as he claims.

Unless you use the historical/legal definition of natural born citizen used by the First Congress of 1790, the author of the 14th Amendment, and the unanimously approved Senate resolution SR511 of 2008, requiring both parents to be citizens, in which case he is clearly not a natural born citizen.

442 posted on 10/15/2009 5:54:08 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

Unfortunately, the article does not prove that he was born in Kenya. Just that Kenyans liked to claim him as being from Kenya. Since his “father” was from Kenya that could be enough to make them hold that belief.

But somebody should be holding all of the little miscellaneous tidbits on a thumb drive just for history sake.

Who knows when someone will decide to eliminate that as well.

Thanks,


443 posted on 10/15/2009 5:55:55 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee

Well you need to find a Judge. It was easy for Obama in Illinois. The law seems to mostly work for the Democrats.


444 posted on 10/15/2009 5:58:02 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
You birthers invented a definition of natural born citizen that is found nowhere in the U.S. Constitution or any established case law,

Truly delusional statement. The First Congress used it, the author of the 14th Amendment used it, Justice Waite used it, and the Senate in their 2008 SR511 used it. Wake up and smell the definition.

445 posted on 10/15/2009 6:00:40 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan
The definition in use by the original 13 state statutes and courts at the time was based on jus soli, and the only time that jus sanguinis applied was for children born outside the boundaries of the states

You can only reach that conclusion if you didn't read the the law because it says: "the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens".

Look up the meaning of the words: "that may".

Let me translate that for you: "children of citizens of the United States are natural born citizens, even though they may have been born here, there, or elsewhere."

Senate resolution SR511 in 2008 used that definition and by that definition alone Obama should not be sitting in the Oval Office.

446 posted on 10/15/2009 6:14:11 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
Unless you use the historical/legal definition of natural born citizen used by the First Congress of 1790, the author of the 14th Amendment, and the unanimously approved Senate resolution SR511 of 2008, requiring both parents to be citizens, in which case he is clearly not a natural born citizen.

The 1790 Naturalization Act covered those born overseas only, as did SR511. So unless your claim is that only those born overseas of two U.S. citizen parents are natural-born citizens then I fail to see the relevance.

447 posted on 10/15/2009 6:17:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

ugh -

You are painting with a mighty broad brush.

The grandmother thing is not clear. It depends on what version you want to believe.

I thought the Kenyan BC on the cloth was unclear. But a lot of effort was made to make it look like a fabricated BC with details of how they faked the document. But they could have faked the fake. I do not believe that they could have generated the seal with a coin impression.

The footprint Kenyan BC is also unclear - but without examples from that hospital during the same year it is not conclusive. What is clear is that there is alot of mud in the water. It is also clear that there are many people trying to muddy the water and to say things are crystal clear when at best they can say that it is inconclusive.

The credit bureau report should have been scrubbed twice to remove cases where it was apparent that it was some other person. My reading of the list is that there is at least a Chicago address where we know Obama resided and he used another SS #. This is not proof that he is ineligible. Just shows a typical liberal attitude to get away with all that you can.

Not sure why anyone would give a false affidavit WRT seeing Holder in a coffee shop with Judge Land. But I will agree that Orly should have been less confrontational with the Judge.

But maybe she is crazy like a fox. And she is willing to be thrown in jail to elevate this story onto the front page.

There is no denying that Obama has sealed up all independent evidence of his past. That alone does not lend credibility to anyone believing his stories and fabrications.

In short Obama Lies. He is good at it, and seems to hold people in a trance. NLP?? And he has the complete and utter fawning by the MSM.

I am circumspect about the information that is out there. There is no smoking gun yet. But it is difficult to trace through a past so convoluted and murky as Obama’s.

Leo Donofrio has been stonewalled by Hawaii in his UIPA request to get the communication between the AG and Fukino. He will see how deep the rabbit hole goes in that direction.

And we are beginning to see how deep the rabbit hole is at Free Republic. There are too many people parroting talking points without thought. There is too much Alinksy type activity.

To me Obama acts like a guilty person - we can see how he is influenced now more by foreign voices than domestic voices. We know the intent of the Framers of the Constitution WRT to foreign influence on the President.

But continue on writing your ditties and poking fun. I will continue remembering how my ggggGrandfather picked up his flintlock that he used in the Revolutionary war and walked up to Lundy’s lane in response to the news that they needed volunteers to fight the British in the War of 1812.

I am not so very big you see - but big enough to say that this Emperor has no clothes. He may have you all in a trance with you only seeing him outfitted in the finest of clothes. But to many, we see that he is stark naked.

Orly can at least see. She knows a communist by sight, and bless her heart she is fighting.


448 posted on 10/15/2009 6:47:43 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The 1790 Naturalization Act covered those born overseas only, as did SR511.

Baloney, no wonder you are confused. You can only reach that conclusion if you don't understand the actual words in the law, because it says:

"the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens".

Look up the meaning of the words: "that may".

Let me translate that for you:

children of citizens of the United States are natural born citizens, even though they may have been born here, there, or elsewhere.

Senate resolution SR511 in 2008 used that definition and by that definition alone Obama should not be sitting in the Oval Office.

449 posted on 10/15/2009 6:49:52 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

btt


450 posted on 10/15/2009 6:58:25 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lundy_s Lane II

Its a free country and everyone is entitled to their opinion. We are all free to dislike Obama. BUT, he was elected as our president. If he was elected without a lot of his personal business being brought out, that is the electorates fault. He’s the president, said, done,and over with.

What Orly has done wrong is to turn it into a frivolous lawsuit. You do not get to sue someone because you are suspicious. Our legal system doesn’t work that way. Birthers don’t get to change all the rules and laws because they don’t like the president. Sorry ‘bout that, but its time for birthers to friggin grow up.

The people on FR who point these simple truths out to birthers are not trolls, lefties, commies, dupes, etc. They are adults and you better be glad they are willing to do it.

If the birthers had their way, without being called out on it by their fellow freepers, Free Republic would become a laughing stock and its credibility would go to zip. It would become the website where the earth is 6,000 years old, and Obama was born in Kenya. There are some sites out there like that.

parsy, who don’t want tosee things go that way


451 posted on 10/15/2009 8:16:24 AM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
"He’s the president, said, done,and over with."

Who made you god?

“frivolous lawsuit?”

How many years of combat do you have under your belt?

That's what I thought.

Well, it might be “frivolous” to you but to those of us who have and are putting our lives on the line to fight for this country and our families don't think there is anything at all "frivolous" about who our CIC is.

Semper Fi,
Kelly

452 posted on 10/15/2009 8:35:19 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I’m not God. I just watched the election returns on TV. I didn’t care to watch him get inaugerated, but the picture was in the paper.

I work in the legal field, so yeah I do know what a frivolous lawsuit is. If you don’t, then read the 43 page decision by Judge Land to sanction Orly. It’s pretty easy to follow and goes into great detail.

And, if you a soldier, you swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and it don’t matter whatever idiot the electorate put into office. It would be like you deciding that since you didn’t like your Colonel, for example, you decided to sue him on the suspicion that he was really a Russian. You would find yourself either in the brig and discharged.

I grew up on military bases, and what with the regular application of my dad’s Air Force belt on my backside, I know full well how to say “Yes, sir” and “No, sir” and how to follow orders.

parsy, who says think about it


453 posted on 10/15/2009 8:57:12 AM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And why is that something you need to know in order for him to prove his eligibility?

I don't but it could be something embarrassing on the BC that would not be indication of ineligibility.

I was trying to give your guy a break.

454 posted on 10/15/2009 11:24:28 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee; danamco
I also don't understand what the balls thing has to do with your "queer" accusation in your earlier posts. For you to take what she said and equate that to a "queer" thing...it's really odd and a bit of a stretch. Care to explain?

Surely.

Per danamco's home page:

blessed enough to get married to a beautiful loving real American woman

Unless danamco is a married lesbian, this statement leads me to believe he is a male.

Thus the queerness.

455 posted on 10/15/2009 11:32:25 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
No one I know is becoming a European Socialist

Wake up, the Government is running the show, so whether you know anyone personally or not is immaterial. The Government has Tanks, Airplanes, and a bunch of armed troops, what are you bringing to the argument?

456 posted on 10/15/2009 12:41:01 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter
I'm beginning to wonder how many trolls there are on this website.

The Trolls Are Due On Maple Street....

457 posted on 10/15/2009 1:24:19 PM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
As any combat pilot knows, when you start getting flak you know you're over the target.
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
--Carl Sagan

458 posted on 10/15/2009 1:30:01 PM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

“it don’t matter whatever idiot the electorate put into office.”

Wrong again, genius.


459 posted on 10/15/2009 3:38:44 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
Correct, you're not god, you're not a lawyer and you're not a combat veteran.

You're just another FR clown who brings nothing to the debate but personal insults directed towards Orly Taitz who IS a lawyer and has more BALLS than anyone else in the GOP or Free Republic. PERIOD

Wipe your nose, genius; you just got bloodied

460 posted on 10/15/2009 3:49:25 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-469 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson