Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: z3n

I like that he’s actually challenging ‘accepted’ scientific views. We’ve seen what happens when people accept established science as the end of all further inquiry (global warming).


8 posted on 10/27/2009 8:19:58 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: mudblood
I understand that, and I have no problem with proposing a new hypothesis, and I have no loss of sympathy for the assault that can come from those who cling to existing theory.

I was just dis-satisfied with the summary. I should not have to read the article to find out why two phenomenon are co-existant. The way the summary was written, you must assume that the earth and it's field are coincidental.

"The New Theory: Earth’s magnetic field is not produced by an internal dynamo within the planet. The magnetic field and the planet are separate parts of a complex dynamo system surrounding the planet"


13 posted on 10/27/2009 8:25:34 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
We’ve seen what happens when people accept established science as the end of all further inquiry (global warming).

True. While science has accumulated a vast amount of knowledge, even great theories like General Relativity are incomplete.

22 posted on 10/27/2009 8:33:38 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson