To: z3n
I like that he’s actually challenging ‘accepted’ scientific views. We’ve seen what happens when people accept established science as the end of all further inquiry (global warming).
8 posted on
10/27/2009 8:19:58 AM PDT by
mudblood
To: mudblood
I understand that, and I have no problem with proposing a new hypothesis, and I have no loss of sympathy for the assault that can come from those who cling to existing theory.
I was just dis-satisfied with the summary. I should not have to read the article to find out why two phenomenon are co-existant. The way the summary was written, you must assume that the earth and it's field are coincidental.
"The New Theory: Earths magnetic field is not produced by an internal dynamo within the planet. The magnetic field and the planet are separate parts of a complex dynamo system surrounding the planet"
13 posted on
10/27/2009 8:25:34 AM PDT by
z3n
To: mudblood
Weve seen what happens when people accept established science as the end of all further inquiry (global warming). True. While science has accumulated a vast amount of knowledge, even great theories like General Relativity are incomplete.
22 posted on
10/27/2009 8:33:38 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson