Replies

The Threat of Mandatory Vaccinations By Adam Murdock, MD

...Did we really need all the hysteria over a highly speculative event (a repeat of the 1918 Swine Flu) with little probability of happening?

The answer might have been "maybe," if we really were experiencing an exact copy of the 1918 flu. Yet, I am unaware that the current mild swine flu has undergone any type of comparable virulent transformation as many were predicting. In addition, a couple of the original vaccine trials published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine examining the efficacy of the H1N1 vaccine demonstrated that up to 40 % of people already had antibodies to the flu and therefore were possibly already immune. (1) (2) As this data is now several months old, the percentage is likely much higher now. It may be that the majority of people already have antibodies to the swine flu. Another study recently published in Euroscience by Purdue scientists predicts that the peak number of cases of swine flu will happen this week through Oct. 24. They also predict that the vaccine is not likely to have much effect on the total number of people that will acquire the swine flu because it has arrived too late. (3)....

So, between the Swine Flu shots and the vaccines against Cervical Cancer, not reducing the number of people who get either of these diseases --and the shots actually killing people-- why is the government sponsoring these immunizations?

Question 2: Why was a vaccine that I and millions of others took over 50 years ago able to virtually wipe out polio, when today these vaccines seem to be killing more people than they save? Isn't science supposed to have gotten better at this?

The Threat of Mandatory Vaccinations By Adam Murdock, MD

"...Did we really need all the hysteria over a highly speculative event (a repeat of the 1918 Swine Flu) with little probability of happening?" [--from the article]

So, between the Swine Flu shots and the vaccines against Cervical Cancer, not reducing the number of people who get either of these diseases --and the shots actually killing people-- why is the government sponsoring these immunizations?

Question 2: Why was a vaccine that I and millions of others took over 50 years ago able to virtually wipe out polio, when today these vaccines seem to be killing more people than they save? Isn't science supposed to have gotten better at this?

I really enjoyed the link you left; the doctor made a lot of sense -- and my guess to your first question anyway is that the government is "in bed" with big drug companies and they are more concerned about their wealth than other peoples' health. It's frustrating as all get-out to be sure. Here's a couple videos for your enjoyment.

Town of Allopath Short Video, by Dr. Mercola
Don't Inject Me, by The Health Ranger