Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. House Health Care Plan Bill (pdf of 1,990 bill)
United States House of Representatives ^ | October 29, 2009 | 11th Congress

Posted on 10/29/2009 8:36:00 AM PDT by MaestroLC

This is the official pdf from the U.S. House of Representatives unveiled by Nancy Pelosi today.

It is 1,990 pages.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; bill; healthcare; house; obama; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: frogjerk

what page is this?


21 posted on 10/29/2009 9:30:16 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
The last 350 pages deals with ‘Indian Health Care Improvement Act’.
22 posted on 10/29/2009 9:37:24 AM PDT by Master of Orion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

We have to cover our children until they are 27?


23 posted on 10/29/2009 9:40:28 AM PDT by VA40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
Line 17 on Page 110.

Once the entire document is downloaded to your computer, you can use the find feature in the upper right hand corner of the document to search.

24 posted on 10/29/2009 9:45:14 AM PDT by An Old Man (Use it up, Wear it out, Make it do, or Do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

2.5% penalty is much cheaper than what I pay now, what does that get me on the public side? hehe


25 posted on 10/29/2009 9:56:54 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All
MORE TAXES

Page 337

‘‘SEC. 59C. SURCHARGE ON HIGH INCOME INDIVIDUALS.
‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of a taxpayer other than a corporation, there is hereby imposed (in addition to any other tax imposed by this subtitle) a tax equal to 5.4 percent of so much of the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer as exceeds $1,000,000.
‘‘(b) TAXPAYERS NOT MAKING A JOINT RETURN.—
In the case of any taxpayer other than a taxpayer making a joint return under section 6013 or a surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), subsection (a) shall be applied by substituting ‘$500,000’ for ‘$1,000,000’.
‘‘(c) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—
For purposes of this section, the term ‘modified adjusted gross income’ means adjusted gross income reduced by any deduction (not taken into account in determining adjusted gross income) allowed for investment interest (as defined in section 163(d)). In the case of an estate or trust, adjusted gross income shall be determined as provided in section 67(e).

26 posted on 10/29/2009 10:08:46 AM PDT by frogjerk (Obama Administration: Security thru Absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...
Connecticut FReepers: CALL, fax, snail-mail and/or e-mail your Congress critter TODAY!

Rep. John Larson (D-CT-1)

202-225-2265

202-225-1031 fax

http://www.larson.house.gov/

Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT-2)

202-225-2076

202-225-4977 fax

http://courtney.house.gov/

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-3)

202-225-3661

202-225-4890 fax

http://delauro.house.gov/

Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT-4)

202-225-5541

202-225-9629 fax

http://himes.house.gov/index.html

Rep. Chris Murphy (D-CT-5)

202-225-4476

202-225-5933 fax

http://www.chrismurphy.house.gov/

27 posted on 10/29/2009 10:13:46 AM PDT by nutmeg (Obamunism is destroying America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
" U.S. House Health Care Plan Bill (pdf of 1,990 bill)"

The load has arrived:


28 posted on 10/29/2009 10:14:04 AM PDT by 444Flyer ("Permission to engage the enemy Sir! " " Permission denied." (Under CIC Obamao.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
1 SEC. 202. PROTECTING THE CHOICE TO KEEP CURRENT

2 COVERAGE.

3 (a) GRANDFATHERED HEALTH INSURANCE COV

4 ERAGE DEFINED.—Subject to the succeeding provisions of

5 this section, for purposes of establishing acceptable cov

6 erage under this division, the term ‘‘grandfathered health

7 insurance coverage’’ means individual health insurance

8 coverage that is offered and in force and effect before the

9 first day of Y1 if the following conditions are met:

10 (1) LIMITATION ON NEW ENROLLMENT.—

11 (A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in

12 this paragraph, the individual health insurance

13 issuer offering such coverage does not enroll

14 any individual in such coverage if the first ef

15 fective date of coverage is on or after the first

16 day of Y1.

Am I reading this correctly that a person can keep their current coverage as long as the insurance company does not offer any more individual policies to anyone? So everyone will eventually be rolled in to the government's program? Seems like that was in the previous "bill" that was released.

And of course it also looks like the pre-existing conditions coverage nonsense is in it.

29 posted on 10/29/2009 10:23:43 AM PDT by Roos_Girl ("Obama is Kenyan for idiot" - CC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

I wonder who write THIS particular monstrosity. Was it the Apollo Alliance once again, the same group that wrote the stimulus bill?


30 posted on 10/29/2009 10:36:47 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

There you have it... And those stupid liberals thought things like denials and waiting lists or RATIONING of care would be gone? HA! Thank you for pulling that out... Posting to my facebook in a bit...


31 posted on 10/29/2009 11:38:10 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man
Subpart A—Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage

LOL. Not just "Without Coverage", but "Without ACCEPTABLE Coverage."

Gee, I wonder who gets to decide what's "acceptable." I know it won't be me....

32 posted on 10/29/2009 11:43:54 AM PDT by kevao (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

So, are you saying you SUPPORT this bill then?


33 posted on 10/29/2009 11:44:32 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VA40

They’ll probably push the age for Student loans up to 27, too. Which means that kids like me — who move out when they are 18 will still be considered as children and not eligible for student loans NOT based upon their parents’ income... 27 years old is pushing it WAY too far, IMHO.


34 posted on 10/29/2009 12:06:23 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl

What is the first day of Y1??? My husband just changed jobs and we won’t be eligible for his new insurance for 90 days. Does this mean my family will HAVE to be on the “public option” for the rest of our lives with NO choice?!?!?!

Someone, please do get back to me on this if I’m reading it wrong!!! Is this just for INDIVIDUAL policies or GROUP policies???


35 posted on 10/29/2009 12:10:09 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: VA40

Darn, my dad made me start paying my own way when I was 18. Oh wait. Maybe that is why I have been self sufficient for the past 40 years. Thanks dad.


36 posted on 10/29/2009 12:48:17 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

Page 110 - The public health insurance option shall provide coverage for abortions.


37 posted on 10/29/2009 12:48:22 PM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

38 posted on 10/29/2009 1:38:11 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC; ex-Texan

The bill equals an Obama dictatorship & massive additional taxes.

39 posted on 10/29/2009 1:55:55 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never "free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/106xx/doc10688/hr3962Rangel.pdf

This is the Congressional Budget Office’s letter to Rangel which summarizes the bill.


40 posted on 10/29/2009 2:10:37 PM PDT by Wisconsinlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson