What Judge Carter wrote:
Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves.
He is not accusing her of perjury, he is says that others have accused Orly of asking them to perjure themselves.
Why does it matter if there was perjury involved? IOW, if Judge Carter wanted the truth then he would not have dismissed the case. He has no proof there was any perjury because obama has not released his long form BC.
Or, does this leave an open door for Dr Orly to pursue the BC issue to prove herself innocent?
On another note, I think Lucas should be Joe Plummered. How much and by whom was lucas paid for his complaint against Dr Orly?
Did Judge Carter pull an Alinsky on Dr Orly? accusing her for what zero has been doing.
To me, that is saying the same thing. He is setting her up for punishment - disbarment or prosecution. Prosecution may be difficult considering what slime balls are involved and accusing Orly.