Seems rather convoluted to me to state you’re honoring the Constitution by ignoring it’s tenets regarding eligibility as it relates to the presidency.
As for other courts and their rulings, they were tasked with making judgments based on the facts before them. So is Judge Carter. What those other judges decided, has no bearing on this case.
Either the facts support the plaintiff’s argument, or they don’t. That’s all the judge should address here.
This guy was looking for any excuse. His Constitutional argument was silly. I believe his admonition regarding other courts was also silly.
“But your honor, here’s the video of the defendant plunging the knife into the victim’s back with his own hand.”
“Look, other courts have acquitted murder defendants. Aren’t you disrespecting those courts by bringing this case before me? Why yes, I believe you are. Dismissed.”
When it comes to the top officials in this nation, there really isn’t any governing law. They can do whatever they please. In this case our Constitution was given the same weight as any worthless bit of paper in the local dump.
If that's what you want, you get a similar result. There are few facts supporting this case. Mainly lots of speculation, supposition and wild-eyed nuttiness.
The only relevant fact is that BHO’s father wasn't a citizen. And that boat has sailed.