Judge dismisses Cal. eligibility challenge - Plaintiffs promise appeal of ruling protecting Obama

WND ^ | 10/29/09 | Bob Unruh

[Jet Jaguar]

BTTT

[IntolerantOfTreason]

Apparently this man used to be a United States Marine. If so, he has disgraced his uniform. A traitor like all the others. Something is very rotten in this country.

[circumbendibus]

Thanks for your input. I did not know about those writings. I found this info on Berg's website:

Currently we have three [3] pending Cases in the Federal Courts:

Berg v. Obama, et al

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA Case No. 08-cv-04083

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case No. 08-4340

This case was dismissed by Judge Surrick on the issue of “Standing”. This Case is currently on appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Oral Argument has been scheduled for October 26, 2009 in the Court of Appeals

Berg as Relator v. Obama, et al

U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Case No. 08-cv-01933

This is the False Claims Act (qui tam) Case which was under seal until June 2009. We are currently awaiting a hearing date on my Motion for Reconsideration on the basis of the Conflict-Of-Interest the Government has with this particular Case.

Hollister v. Soetoro, et al

U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Case No. 08-cv-02254

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Case No. 09-5080

This is the Case regarding Gregory S. Hollister who is a retired Colonel and subject to recall by the President. Mr. Hollister questions the validity of any Orders issued by Soetoro and has asked the Court to resolve the issues regarding Soetoro’s legality as President and who he should take his Orders from, in the case he is recalled into active status. This Case was dismissed by Judge Robertson in March 2009 and Sanctions issued against John D. Hemenway, Esquire. This Case is currently on Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

[Cheerio]

So the bottom line is that if you can fake/fraud your way to the swearing in ceremony you win. Gee who knew?

While I don't have time to look up the posts right now, I remember discussions on FR to that effect back in Dec 08, that we HAD to get this resolved before the Congress ok'd the Electoral College's submission - we tried to get at least ONE Congresscritter to stand up to this usurper.

I am not an attorney, but have seen many posters state that once he is POTUS, there is ONLY ONE way to legally remove him.

[rxsid]

It sure is.

[Dajjal]

obumpa

[Jude in WV]

From Psalm 27

12Deliver me not over unto the will of mine enemies: for false witnesses are risen up against me, and such as breathe out cruelty.

13I had fainted, unless I had believed to see the goodness of the LORD in the land of the living.

14Wait on the LORD: be of good courage, and he shall strengthen thine heart: wait, I say, on the LORD.

[thecraw]

So the bottom line is that if you can fake/fraud your way to the swearing in ceremony you win. Gee who knew?

Ah yes, the floodgates are now open, therefore...

I, The Craw, in the interest of openness and transparency, freely admit that even though I was born in Sweden, and understand that my constitutional eligibility and civil rights are based on precedent set on November 4th, 2008, hereby officially declare my candidacy for President of the United States of America.

/sarc

[trumandogz]

Interesting, but it has nothing to do with Phil Berg’s call that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney put on trial for the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks.

[Canadian Outrage]

Oy-vey!! Lots of Luck!! CO

[Smokeyblue]

“I am not an attorney, but have seen many posters state that once he is POTUS, there is ONLY ONE way to legally remove him.”

He didn’t get there LEGALLY so he isn’t President and DOES NOT have to be removed. The office of the President is currently vacant. A usurper is posing as President. I am basing this on the assumption that Obama Sr. is in fact his father (which hasn’t been proven). Natural born citizens have TWO American parents.

[jamese777]

He didn’t get there LEGALLY so he isn’t President and DOES NOT have to be removed. The office of the President is currently vacant. A usurper is posing as President. I am basing this on the assumption that Obama Sr. is in fact his father (which hasn’t been proven). Natural born citizens have TWO American parents.

---

That’s an opinion but it has no basis in the law. What constitutes a natural born citizen as it pertains to Article Two of the Constitution has never been adjudicated in any court of law. There is no precedent and there won’t be one applied ex-post facto to Barack Obama.
The courts know that CONGRESS had the opportunity to challenge Obama’s eligibility at the certification of the Electoral College vote. Not one of 535 members of Congress issued a challenge and so Vice President Cheney certified the Electoral College vote.
As Judge Carter said today in his opinion, he’s not about to reverse the electoral will of 69,456,897 voters. I doubt that any judge will.

[Wild Irish Rogue]

When my son deployed , because we were members of the FRG-the Family Readiness Group-we would get a lot of emails and reminders,
even if it didn’t pertain to us.
I was always struck by the emphasis on birth certificates.
Those deploying must bring important papers like birth certificates and marriage licenses and another important documents to some meeting-
this paperwork dealt with death benefits.
Dependents of those deploying also had to bring birth certificates to another gathering regarding Tri Care and other benefits for soldier’s wives and children .
No where did the DOD requirements say-some crappy , on line , unverified, sketchy COLB will suffice.
Maybe it’s just me, but, if I was Commander in Chief in war time,
I would provide the same information to the public that I require my soldiers and their families to provide to my DOD.
But’s that’s me, Obama obviously does not feel the same duty to his soldiers on the battlefield.

[Smokeyblue]

Unfortunately for you, I know better.

Keep carrying the Usurper’s water. He loves you useful idiots.

[jamese777]

Unfortunately for you, I know better.

Keep carrying the Usurper’s water. He loves you useful idiots.

---

As I said, you’re entitled to your personal opinion.
Unfortunately for you, I can count.
There have now been 59 lawsuits logged to challenge Obama’s eligibility. The docket shows 51 lawsuits dismissed or denied, zero victories for plaintiffs and 7 lawsuits pending or on appeal.
Six lawsuits have reached the US Supreme Court. It takes only four justices to agree (the rule of four) in order for the full court to hear a case. There are five conservative justices at the current time: Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia and Thomas. None of these eligibility cases have been granted a hearing: (Berg v Obama, Craig v US, Donofrio v Wells, Lightfoot v Bowen, Schneller v Cortes, and Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz).

[Canadian Outrage]

So let’s see it!! Your “bottom” that is. I haven’t seen much movement of any significance except Tea Party Protests. Obama laughs at that. He has “seized” control as they have said. So he’s not one bit worried about protests. In the meantime, he’s building a personal army of thugs which he intends to arm to the teeth all the while dis-arming and gutting the US Military. How am I being hysterical?? Let’s just wait and see okay? CO

[Smokeyblue]

I don’t care how many lawsuits have been dismissed. The Truth is THE TRUTH.

Every lawsuit has been dismissed on “standing” not facts. The reason all these lawsuits have been filed is to get the FACTS established with evidence and testimony.

Obama SHALL QUALIFY. He has not done so no matter how you slice it.

Judge Carter weaseled his way out of this with circular logic.

[jamese777]

There ARE American citizens who might present a strong case for legal standing. Their names are John Sidney McCain and Sarah Palin. They were directly and personally injured by Barack Obama becoming the 44th President of the United States. Yet John McCain and Sarah Palin have not even filed an amicus brief in any of these 59 lawsuits, neither has ANY member of Congress attempted to assist plaintiffs in any of these suits.
Barack Hussein Obama QUALIFIED when his Electoral College Votes were counted and certified by Vice President Dick Cheney on January 8, 2009 at the Joint Session of Congress with the unanimous approval of both Houses of Congress present.

And finally, from Judge Carter’s decision:
Conduct of Plaintiffs’ Counsel

The hearings have been interesting to say the least. Plaintiffs’ arguments through Taitz have generally failed to aid the Court. Instead, Plaintiffs’ counsel has favored rhetoric seeking to arouse the emotions and prejudices of her followers rather than the language of a lawyer seeking to present arguments through cogent legal reasoning. While the Court has no desire to chill Plaintiffs’ enthusiastic presentation, Taitz’s argument often hampered the efforts of her cocounsel Gary Kreep (“Kreep”), counsel for Plaintiffs Drake and Robinson, to bring serious issues before the Court. The Court has attempted to give Plaintiffs a voice and a chance to be heard by respecting their choice of counsel and by making every effort to discern the legal arguments of Plaintiffs’ counsel amongst the rhetoric. This Court exercised extreme patience when Taitz endangered this case being heard at all by failing to properly file and serve the complaint upon Defendants and held multiple hearings to ensure that the case would not be dismissed on the technicality of failure to effect service. While the original complaint in this matter was filed on January 20, 2009, Defendants were not properly served until August 25, 2009. Taitz successfully served Defendants only after the Court intervened on several occasions and requested that defense counsel make significant accommodations for her to effect service. Taitz also continually refused to comply with court rules and procedure. Taitz even asked this Court to recuse Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato on the basis that he required her to comply with the Local Rules. See Order Denying Pls.’ Mot. For Modification of Mag. J. Nakazato’s Aug. 6, 2009, Order; Denying Pls.’ Mot. to Recuse Mag. J. Nakazato; and Granting Ex Parte App. for Order Vacating Voluntary Dismissal (Sep. 8, 2009). Taitz also attempted to dismiss two of her clients against their wishes because she did not want to work with their new counsel. See id. Taitz encouraged her supporters to contact this Court, both via letters and phone calls. It was improper and unethical for her as an attorney to encourage her supporters to attempt to influence this Court’s decision. Despite these attempts to manipulate this Court, the Court has not considered any outside pleas to influence the Court’s decision.

Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court.

While the Court seeks to ensure that all interested parties have had the opportunity to be heard, the Court cannot condone the conduct of Plaintiffs’ counsel in her efforts to influence this Court.

[El Sordo]

Soap box.
Then:
Ballot box.
Then:
Jury box.
Then: Angry ranting on an internet forum.

[null and void]

Ah. THAT was it!

Thanks!