But wait, how does he show his long form to you, in a venue that you accept? On TV, to a bunch of Republican lawmakers? Or Congress?
To Orly Taitz and Gary Kreep, to prove that it is right?
Does it travel the U.S., like the Shroud of Turin, so people can look at it and make up their minds?
Who validates this?
“Does it travel the U.S., like the Shroud of Turin, so people can look at it and make up their minds?”
Hilarious!!!
parsy, who is ROTFLMAO!
I’m OK with the legal system, for the most part. The process of discovery, depositions, testimony and evidence, etc., all work to provide the parties to the action the opportunity to challenge, prove or disprove the allegations.
I don’t need to see the BC for any reason other than simple curiosity. I’m quite OK with the lawyers and the courts, through expert witnesses and such, getting to the bottom of the issues in this case. To date, though, there hasn’t been a judge willing to allow any of the cases to proceed to hearing on the merits. All of them have been dismissed, mostly for lack of standing.
Hope that answers your questions. But...Shroud of Turin? That may not be a good analogy given the continued debate over its authenticity. Some folks are accepting of this relic as is offered. Some folks are skeptical still. And, others have become downright ‘Shrouders’...
How about a judge and a jury, as these things are usually handled?