To: Zakeet
How could any sport be homophobic that has as an on field position called “tight end?”
13 posted on
10/31/2009 6:30:49 AM PDT by
Reaganesque
("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
To: Reaganesque
Imagine if you will how many times both the offense and defense would be drawn offsides with slobbering Barney Franks at quarterback.
To: Reaganesque
28 posted on
10/31/2009 6:45:17 AM PDT by
Past Your Eyes
(You don't have to be ignorant to be a Democrat...but if you are...so what?)
To: Reaganesque
How could any sport be homophobic that has as an on field position called “tight end?” Or "wide receiver?"
36 posted on
10/31/2009 6:59:21 AM PDT by
Mr Ramsbotham
(You must choose ... death, or bulunga.)
To: Reaganesque
Ah yes, and the other terms we had in high school football:
“The Quarterback needs to fit it in tight to the Split End.”
“We’re gonna run a dive up the “A” Hole.”
“Tell the Running Back to squeeze between those two guys.”
49 posted on
10/31/2009 7:24:33 AM PDT by
Raider Sam
(They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
To: Reaganesque
Yeah... I wonder how hairdressers feel about split ends?
NFL Homophobic? Too many guys squatting all over the place. Good grief!
To: Reaganesque
How could any sport be homophobic that has as an on field position called “tight end?”Or the "wide receiver."
To: Reaganesque
as opposed to baseball with catcher and pitcher. :D
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson