Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monkey Face

Some of us believe it’s better NOT to broadcast our flaws and weaknesses to potential enemies.

What purpose do you think it serves to tell the world that the ‘armed guards’ aren’t really armed?

Seems like that could go unannounced, and resolved quietly.


68 posted on 11/10/2009 3:30:43 PM PST by 1Swashbuckler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: 1Swashbuckler

If it’s not made known, it can’t be changed.
Think about it.

If your son were in a security job, and told to shoot anyone who crossed the line, but not given ammo, what would you do? How would you feel? Especially if he were killed in the line of duty?

Why be quiet about the security of this country? If terrorists know we are ARMED they will be less likely to shoot us. If you have a better idea, I suggest you research Ronald Reagan’s stance on Peace. And Socialism.

In the meantime, you’d better pray that Obama doesn’t go belly up when Push comes to Shove.


71 posted on 11/10/2009 3:47:09 PM PST by Monkey Face (I wear a yellow ribbon for ForgotenKnight, my army hero grandson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson