Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marron
"Hasan was an army officer on an army base. Getting his hands on a weapon was not a problem."

That's not entirely accurate, at all. He had no more access to a weapon, than a civilian school teacher working on the base. I think civilians believe that Army & Marine Corps bases are places where weapons are just laying about. They aren't. Weapons are highly secured, at all times. If you don't have a reason to remove your weapon from the armory, you're not going to be removing a weapon from the armory.

And, there's more than a probable chance that Hasan wasn't even assigned a sidearm, unlike all other line or infantry officers that are assigned a personal sidearm. It's probably for these reasons that Hasan used his personally acquired and owned weapons.

6 posted on 11/11/2009 11:57:13 AM PST by OldDeckHand (Obamacare - So bad, even Joe Lieberman isn't going to vote for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

He was an Officer, all he had to do was show up at the armory and withdraw a rifle or a pistol and say he was going to the range to practice.

Not only are officers allowed to practice their marksmanship they are encouraged to do so.


33 posted on 11/11/2009 1:08:27 PM PST by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson