Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CRU Hack: Are we missing the Smoking Gun? Tropical tropospheric trends?
RealClimate ^ | Never | Unknown

Posted on 11/21/2009 6:41:34 PM PST by dila813

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: dila813

Thank You
Everyone should check this site out.


41 posted on 11/21/2009 7:34:42 PM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I would have thought the same, but you can see the model lines in the hacked file just like you can in the one posted on realclimate.

If you look at the key on real climate, these other lines are model lines.

Makes me wonder if their models are beginning to report non-human induced global warming and they aren’t telling anyone.


42 posted on 11/21/2009 7:36:59 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dila813
“No, look at it again, these are different heights in the atmosphere.”

Yes, I agree, but they are referring to height on the y-axis by way of pressure. As you go higher in the atmosphere the pressure decreases, so they are plotting pressure against decade trends in temperature on the x-axis.

43 posted on 11/21/2009 7:43:44 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: palmer

If the models were any good, those box and whisker boxed would be right centered in the middle of the models.

This chart says they are smoking dope.


44 posted on 11/21/2009 7:44:17 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

yes,

that is the point

the box and whiskers shows they are smoking dope with their models.

This is standard statistics, if the models were any good the models would be all around the box and whiskers, but it isn’t.

So the chart says all the models are crap.


45 posted on 11/21/2009 7:46:08 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dila813

bump for tomorrow

Someone NEEDS to be prosecuted for this collosal fraud against the world! As well, the obama administration should be immediately investigated to find out who knew what, when they knew it, and WHY they allowed this bogus informaiton in the IPCC report to go forward resulting in the world’s largest scam ever- OUR government has scammed us!!! OUR government has cammed businesses!!! Billions have been payed to ‘fix’ somethign that can NEVER be fixed, and which, quite frankly does NOT need to be fixed!!! Nature works fine all by itself!

You can bert your bottom dollar that this administration knew all about hte cover-upd, but decided to push through this assinine global warmign mandate irregardless of whether it was goign to ruin us or not- Where are the GOP DEMANDING a thorough investigation into this? So far, all we’ve got is Inhoffe in essence tellijgn Boxer ‘Nanna-nanna-boo-boo, we win, you lose, get a life’? He shoudl be DEMANDING a complete investigation into this collosal fraud against the public!!!

I also note that fox news isn’t headlining the story, and has written an article that is almost excusatory toward the CRIMINALS who scammed us at hte CUI and IPCC

Has anyone seen ANY of the fox shows shouting the alarm about this discovery? I haven’t watched Fox today, except for a few short segments but haven’t heard narry a word abotu htis issue yet


46 posted on 11/21/2009 7:52:22 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Perhaps two authors with different ways of interpreting the data (all “scientific” of course). The timing of the end point matters as well since there has been a bunch of UT cooling lately in temperate zones (can’t find a link right now). Here’s a related paper pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/r-3461.pdf


47 posted on 11/21/2009 7:54:41 PM PST by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

They don’t understand it, they don’t report it.

They may be seeking experts that can evaluate this, but possibly like you said they will do nothing.


48 posted on 11/21/2009 7:55:23 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FortWorthPatriot

[[Well, don’t forget that Global Warming causes everything.]]

Yep- a report out today is trying, beleive it or not- to blame the rise in prostitution on global warming

Personally, I think global warmign is causing tooth decay and hairline fractures of our miniscus bones- Thank goodness we’ll all have FREE FREE FREE healthcare soon to ‘combat the health problems caused by global wamring’


49 posted on 11/21/2009 7:55:53 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

look where 0.0 is in both and which side of the line they lay on.


50 posted on 11/21/2009 7:57:54 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Looks like the published curve is shifted to the right 0.2-0.3 degrees to make it show warmer temperatures. They probably persuaded themselves that all of the data needed a “correction”. I’m sure they had a technical justification for it.

Figures don’t lie, but liars can figure. When science merges with politics, politics usually wins.


51 posted on 11/21/2009 7:58:44 PM PST by Rocky (Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I should add that the two charts in this thread are both for tropical troposphere where the models show warming. The UT cooling I mentioned in my previous post is temperate, not tropical.


52 posted on 11/21/2009 7:59:26 PM PST by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: palmer

This is a trend chart, so both of these charts would have to contain at least 40 years of data.

You can’t get a trend without at least 4 years but since the chart decade, this translates to 40 years. see....make sense?


53 posted on 11/21/2009 8:00:37 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dila813

[[I really think this is what this hacker wanted us to see. If you look at it and the link above. These are the same thing, but one must be true and the other is false.]]

Quite frankly, neither one of them are ‘true’ as the placement of the recording devices was exposed not so long ago to reveal that they wewre placed in spots that were articially high temps- you can’t trust ANYTHING the CRU or the IPCC or ANY ‘man-caused’ global warmign advocate tells you or shopws you- the WHOLE thing is a massive fraud meant to rip off the wealthy and hte poor alike


54 posted on 11/21/2009 8:00:54 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
I’m sure they had a technical justification for it.

I'm sure it was adjusted in a very sciencey sort of way.

55 posted on 11/21/2009 8:01:46 PM PST by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

lol,

I keep asking myself what the hacker wants us to see.

The guy that released this has something they wanted to expose.

Is this it?


56 posted on 11/21/2009 8:02:01 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Gotcha! Thanks. I wasn’t quite sure what I was looking at there. :)


57 posted on 11/21/2009 8:03:02 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (I don't have a 'Cousin Pookie'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dila813

That sounds about right.


58 posted on 11/21/2009 8:03:07 PM PST by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Thanks!


59 posted on 11/21/2009 8:06:54 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (I don't have a 'Cousin Pookie'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dila813

It seems like the whole load of e-mails is a treasure trove. Each day, the revelations get better. I don’t know if there was one particular thing the revealer wanted us to see. (I am inclined to believe this was an inside job rather than a hacker.) It may just be the whole tone of the conversation that is ultimately most damning.

I think it’s just great, for example, that we read an e-mail where they’re talking about how to get a publication to stop accepting articles from AGW skeptics. And then there’s another e-mail criticizing the skeptics because they are not publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Machiavellian, to be sure.


60 posted on 11/21/2009 8:09:22 PM PST by Rocky (Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson