I don’t necessarily disagree with you. Still, the owner had the franchise for over 20 years and wasn’t required to sell alcohol. It just came up when he had to renew his franchise license. They wanted him to change. He didn’t want to change. He has never said anything negative about Sonny’s as far as I know. He just stuck to his beliefs and decided to go in a different direction rather than make the changes they required. I admire him for his actions.
I didn’t read the article. If it mentions (and I’m not doubting you), that he had the franchise for years and hadn’t served alcohol, you’ve got a good point. Ultimately, the franchiser does set the rules though.
Alcohol sales raise significant dollars. The franchiser is able to review sales policies and see room for improvement. I don’t think it’s unfair for them to realize they are not getting their full bang for the buck, and ask the franchisee to adopt their policy recommendations.
It sounds like this guy is a guy trying to do what he thinks is right. I appreciate that. I’m just not convinced the franchiser is a bad entity because they want the establishment to realize it’s optimal capabilities.
You and I might agree with the franchisee that liquor shouldn’t be served, but it really doesn’t matter other than to provide moral support.
I cannot come down on the side that the franchisee is right here.