Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Honduras Congress Rejects Zelaya's Reinstatement
AFP ^ | 12/02/09

Posted on 12/02/2009 6:04:44 PM PST by BunnySlippers

TEGUCIGALPA — A majority in the Honduran Congress have voted against reinstating deposed President Manuel Zelaya and allowing him to finish out his term of office.

A simple majority of 65 lawmakers in the 128-member body voted against Zelaya's return to the presidency shortly before 730 pm (0130 GMT) on Wednesday after more than six hours of debate.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congresonacional; hondurancongress; honduras; manuelzelaya; partidonacional; porfiriolobo; tegucigalpa; zelaya
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: don-o

Thank God!!

BUH-BYE MEL!!!!!


21 posted on 12/02/2009 6:27:19 PM PST by cleveland gop (WE ARE SOOOOOOO SCREWED!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Honduras. Obama will cut off any aid, and attempt to co-op Marxist regimes to destabilize Honduras.

Obama is as close to satan as any man can get.


22 posted on 12/02/2009 6:28:41 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
"Obama is as close to satan as any man can get."

He's Satan's handmaiden...if ya get my drift.

23 posted on 12/02/2009 6:33:21 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Nice color scheme. I hate the red state=Republican crap. We are the blue-they are the red!


24 posted on 12/02/2009 6:34:09 PM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

They’re still calling it a coup! If it was a coup they would have shot the SOB!


25 posted on 12/02/2009 6:37:42 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

I’m guessing the leftist media probably didn’t stick around to get the full results, but ran to report as soon as more than 50% were against; thus they could slant it as a ‘slim majority’ even though the vote was still going on.


26 posted on 12/02/2009 6:39:50 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (LIBERTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I still don’t trust Obama to do the right thing. His instincts will be to side with raving Latin American leftists in other countries rather than with the people of Honduras deciding their own fate.


27 posted on 12/02/2009 6:42:32 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Thank you for your information. That makes the comments more plausible.


28 posted on 12/02/2009 6:44:01 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I think something like 60 abstained.
29 posted on 12/02/2009 6:46:12 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (3V3Ry71N' 084M4 D03z 83N3f17Z MU5l1mz. c01NC1d3nc3?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2398967/posts

Yep, on this new thread the vote’s up past 90 against Z.


30 posted on 12/02/2009 6:59:56 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (LIBERTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

You’re right, he can’t be trusted when the first thing he did was cozy up to Chavez and he’ll surely do it with others.


31 posted on 12/02/2009 7:00:07 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

99 votes, now.


32 posted on 12/02/2009 7:03:31 PM PST by HonCitizen (if to live, the fewer the men, the greater share of honor (Sheakspeare, Henry V))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

BUMP!


33 posted on 12/02/2009 7:07:20 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
RED is the socialists banner, and is exactly the reason why the socialist press switched overnight after the Carter election and started calling the free states "Red" and the socialist states "Blue".

Early on, some channels used a scheme of red for Democrats and blue for Republicans. The first television news network to use colors to depict the states won by presidential candidates was NBC.

In 1976, John Chancellor, the anchorman for the NBC Nightly News, asked his network's engineers to construct a large electronic map of the USA. The map was placed in the network's election-night news studio. If Jimmy Carter, the Democratic candidate that year, won a state it would light up in red; if Gerald Ford, the Republican, carried a state it would light up in blue. The feature proved to be so popular that four years later all three major television networks would use colors to designate the states won by the presidential candidates on Election Night. NBC continued to use the color scheme employed in 1976 for several years; NBC newsman David Brinkley famously referred to the 1980 election map as showing Ronald Reagan's 44-state landslide as resembling a "suburban swimming pool".[6]

CBS, from 1984 on, used the opposite scheme: blue for Democrats, red for Republicans. ABC used yellow for one major party and blue for the other in 1976. However, in 1980 and 1984, ABC used red for Republicans and blue for Democrats. As late as 1996, there was still no universal association of one color with one party.[7] If anything, by 1996, color schemes were relatively mixed, as CNN, CBS, ABC, and The New York Times referred to Democratic states with the color blue and Republican ones as red, while Time Magazine and the Washington Post used an opposite scheme.[8][9][10]

In the days following the protracted 2000 election, major media outlets began conforming to the same color scheme because the electoral map was continually in view and conformity made for easy and instant viewer comprehension. On Election Night that year there was no coordinated effort to code Democratic states blue and Republican states red; the association gradually emerged. Partly as a result of this eventual and near-universal color-coding, the terms "red states" and "blue states" entered popular usage in the weeks following the 2000 presidential election. Journalists began to routinely refer to "blue states" and "red states," even before the 2000 election was settled.[citation needed]

After the results were final, journalists stuck with the color scheme, as the December 2001 The Atlantic's cover story by David Brooks entitled, "One Nation, Slightly Divisible" illustrated. Thus, red and blue became fixed in the media and in many people's minds,[11] despite the fact that no "official" color choices had been made by the parties.

Of course, if you go over to the idiots at the RNC website, you will see a bright red theme.

You will know we are on the way back when that is gone.

34 posted on 12/02/2009 7:11:07 PM PST by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Thanks for the ping. Great news


35 posted on 12/02/2009 7:27:44 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I was in Honduras over the Easter holidays. I really enjoyed going to the Mayan ruins in Copan. There are lots of towns between the capital and Copan that are fun to explore. The only problems I encountered are 1) never drink the water, only use bottle water, and 2) don’t ever eat any uncooked food. There are lots of bacteria and amoebas that we don’t encounter in the US that can cause some nasty intestinal problems. We also took Cipro antibiotic as a preventative all the time we were there and it “mostly” worked.


36 posted on 12/02/2009 7:35:16 PM PST by marshall_t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers; All

Now is the time to deal with Zelaya. Drag him out of the Brazilian Embassy and exact some frontier justice.


37 posted on 12/02/2009 7:35:59 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Ping


38 posted on 12/02/2009 7:39:26 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
On Election Night that year there was no coordinated effort to code Democratic states blue and Republican states red; the association gradually emerged. Partly as a result of this eventual and near-universal color-coding, the terms "red states" and "blue states" entered popular usage in the weeks following the 2000 presidential election. Journalists began to routinely refer to "blue states" and "red states," even before the 2000 election was settled.[citation needed]

Citation needed, indeed. IIRC, it was USA Today's infamous county-by-county map that flipped the colors.


39 posted on 12/02/2009 10:49:47 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Two blogs for the price of none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson