Natural Law, the words ‘no longer applicable’ do not equate with ‘incomplete’.
The Bible is EXACTLY as complete as God intended for us to have. He is not fallible.
The Roman Catholic Church is a different subject, it has teachings I disagree with. My Savior is Christ, not a church, not a priest, not a Pope, certainly not Mary.
IF the Roman Catholic Church accepts ideas counter to the Bible, then, IMHO, they are Wrong. Sorry if that upsets you.
If you can point at the writings you call ‘Scripture’ and then say they are ‘wrong’ or ‘incomplete’, then you are just as wrong. Sorry if that upsets you.
Your beef is not with me. I didn't bring up the subject of "ignore that part of the bible", "this part has been superseded", "this is literal, that isn't", "this is symbolic, but that isn't". I only responded. Even you will not stand behind every word and phrase in the bible because you have applied some filter like the examples I published above.
Your beef is that I look to the Roman Catholic Church, whom I believe to be guided by the Holy Spirit and governed by Apostolic Succession, instead of Calvin, Luther, the Rev. Billy-Bob Rolex, and the Young Earth Creationists for that guidance.