Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: penelopesire
It was a "chick interest" question ~ the way women in the viewing audience see the situation, knowing that the "help" (the social secretary) had the bizarre dress on this time rather than the First Lady, it could be that it was a question that HAD TO BE ADDRESSED.

Gibbs blew it. There'll be no more chillun' in that family.

44 posted on 12/04/2009 4:12:15 PM PST by muawiyah (Git Out The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Or maybe it was a misdirection question to get people talking about ‘jealousies’, ‘gossip’ or ‘intrigue’ at the WH, instead of focusing on the real question...Who screwed up and why is the WH throwing the Secret Service under the bus for something they are responsible for. Who knows with this crowd.


48 posted on 12/04/2009 4:24:29 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson