So, do you think it was acceptable to question whether Trig was her son, and to force her to produce a birth certificate? Because that is what this argument says.
Meanwhile, here is what Palin said about Obama and citizenship, under the heading Stupid Conspiracies:
Voters have every right to ask candidates for information if they so choose. I’ve pointed out that it was seemingly fair game during the 2008 election for many on the left to badger my doctor and lawyer for proof that Trig is in fact my child. Conspiracy-minded reporters and voters had a right to ask... which they have repeatedly.So, either Palin believes Obama is a citizen, and thinks the question is useless, or she doesn't, but has no interest in getting to the truth.But at no point – not during the campaign, and not during recent interviews – have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.
In any case, it is clear that Palin has absolutely NO INTEREST in asking Obama to show us his birth certificate. Which puts her squarely with most every other elected republican.
But she ALSO said, that when asked, even though it was bogus, SHE produced the proof. And therein lies the difference. It isn’t that SHE didn’t ask, but that WE have a right to ask, AND we have a right to the answer, whether YOU think it is legit or not.
Sarah’s playing politics here. And quite well it would seem. She throws the Trig BC back in their faces and turns the tables asking what’s the big deal, “I produced Trig’s”.
The libs, unwittingly gave her this oportunity - she’s using it. Can’t say as I blame her.