Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Matt Hatter
I wonder if another state(s) could file a lawsuit that would need to go all the way to the Supreme Court over this. That would throw a monkey wrench in this bill for a long time.
Any merit to this idea?


Yes there is a lot of merit to the idea IF we actually had a Supreme Court that upheld the Constitution and had not already kissed the ass of Emperor 0bama.

Communists (aka '0bamunists') are in control of the Executive Branch and the Congress, and the Judiciary is nothing but their rubber stamp now.

Don't you know we're living in the United Soviet States of Amerika now?

But a great idea regardless.
12 posted on 12/20/2009 5:05:23 AM PST by mkjessup (Dec 20, 1941 - President Franklin D. 0bama changes his name to "Kyushu 0bama San")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

Yea, I don’t have much faith in the SC, but I just wonder if some type of legal action would force a big wrench in the whole deal. The other comments are valid too...what about the rest of Florida? What about state legislatures forced to come up with money that Nebraska won’t?

This whole thing smacks of the same repressive acts that the British government forced on the Colonists. When you gerrymander benefits for one state and another is left holding the bag, you are back to taxation without representation. (Well, we have been there for a long time, actually).

Louisana was bad, Nebraska is obscene. I would hope tea party movements start within those two states ( and spread all over) that would champion nullification of this damn bill.


19 posted on 12/20/2009 5:39:24 AM PST by Matt Hatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson