Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/23/2009 6:26:17 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: IrishMike
for all of their anti-religious leanings, the liberals are on a holy quest for health care insurance, and in this holy crusade, the ends justify the means.

anything goes, as long as they conquer the health care industry.

2 posted on 12/23/2009 6:32:34 AM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike
The party of ‘tolerance and inclusion’ is neither. Dems don't want any dissenting FACTS to reach the public at large. They have a monopoly in Big Media so that is a likelihood. Can you just imagine if the masses were actually getting the TRUTH from Big Media?? We would own the House, Senate and the Presidency.
3 posted on 12/23/2009 6:33:10 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

Other Talking Points:

1) racist
2) extremist
3) Corporate shrill
4) bitter clinger
5) religious kook
6) Denier
7) chauvanist
8) uncle Tom
9) uncaring
10) greedy


4 posted on 12/23/2009 6:35:13 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

The part about Alan Grayson makes me want to start up a website - HeIsNotMyCongressmanButHeIsNuts.com


5 posted on 12/23/2009 6:36:24 AM PST by Infralutheran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

I’m laughing at the fact there’s a group called “Move On” STILL complaining about the 2000 election.


6 posted on 12/23/2009 6:38:06 AM PST by MuttTheHoople (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9c/TeddyVWad.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike


7 posted on 12/23/2009 6:38:11 AM PST by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

Well, that’s their base - highly emotional, knee-jerk reaction types. They don’t need a reasonable arguement, just a catchy talking point or two.


8 posted on 12/23/2009 6:47:01 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

These criminals, these degenerates, these marauding filth on the left are going to go down hard.

The sort of social and financial tyrannies they seek to impose can only be accomplished with terror and violence.

I truly do not believe they will find the reaction surviveable.


9 posted on 12/23/2009 6:47:24 AM PST by Psalm 144 (What did you think NEW WORLD ORDER meant? The Constitution? States' rights? Individual liberty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/klavan-on-the-culture/kP_PPtgzhXbuwkOe3tmA6Q


14 posted on 12/23/2009 7:21:36 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” — President Harry S. Truman (D-MO)


17 posted on 12/23/2009 11:01:20 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin: What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

For your holiday conversations:
What is “Global Warming”?

It is the theory that the mean temperature of the earth is increasing due to the greenhouse effect, caused by greenhouse gases such as CO2, which is produced by humans burning of fossil or carbon based fuels for energy. The solution to this is the reduction of the use of carbon based fuels.

OK, now that we agree on that, let’s step through this.

1st, what is the “right” mean temperature of the earth?
Has it ever changed without man’s influence?

2nd, the greenhouse effect in and of itself is not a bad thing, it is a good thing - we’d freeze to death at night or in the winter without it.

3rd, What is the most abundant, and also the most contributory “greenhouse gas”?
CO2?
No, it’s water vapor, comprising 95% of the greenhouse effect. Man’s contribution to the amount of water vapor is less than .001%, so we can ignore it.

Back to CO2. CO2 contributes around 3.6% to the greenhouse effect.
But what percentage of CO2 is natural and how much man-made? 97% of CO2 is naturally occurring, 3% due to man’s actions.
This amounts to a 0.117% man-caused contribution to the greenhouse effect due to carbon emissions.

So, even if we ELIMINATED the use of carbon based fuels for energy production, thus destroying our lifestyle and civilization, we’d have less than a .117% effect on “global warming”.

Now, I know that leftists are married to these “solutions” and will want to implement them anyway, regardless of their ineffectiveness. Now, can we discuss why? (topic for another post)

Source:Global Warming: A Closer Look at the Numbers


19 posted on 12/23/2009 11:32:36 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

Haven’t even read it all yet, but enough to conclude that the Democrapic party has now become completely deranged, and—RUNNING SCARED. -—and by the way, what are they so enraged about? They are achieving what they want...or are they afraid in a short time they will be exposed, the whole vicious communist takeover will be laid wide open for all the world to see?


21 posted on 12/23/2009 4:27:14 PM PST by molybdenum (Democrat demogogues--you ain't seen rightwing radicals yet!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson