Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
In last week's debate, Brown made it clear that his abortion position is identical to Coakley's.

That is a flat-out lie, EV, and you should be ashamed for posting it. Brown is against partial-birth abortion, in favor of abortion restrictions, and against federal funding for abortion. Coakley wanted federal funding for abortion to be part of health care reform.

You have no credibility when you make deliberate distortions of someone's views to try and hold your own pointless point together.

And, quite frankly, you are an adherent of a man who has NEVER won an election. Brown has already done more practical advancement for conservatism than Keyes ever will - because his victory will do to the Obama agenda what pouring water on the witch did in Oz. And quite frankly, that IMO is why Alan is in such a twist here.

153 posted on 01/20/2010 11:40:35 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

It’s a sad day when you’re sitting here providing political cover for a pro-abort. Actually, you’re a prime example of why candidates like Brown are bad. You’re further setting up the Republican Party as a party with no firm principles worth talking about.


170 posted on 01/20/2010 11:53:36 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

“Brown is against...federal funding for abortion.”

But in favor of state funding for abortion.

Either way, it ain’t pro-life.


196 posted on 01/20/2010 12:38:18 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson