Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Not scalable for passenger cars at the number driven today.


5 posted on 01/24/2010 5:38:34 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

Before you count out CNG..India started a program to convert all their buses and cabs to CNG. The infrastructure is mostly there. You install gas compressors at gas stations to compress natural gas into cylinders to fill the vehicles. We already have the gas pipelines. The tanks are bigger, which is not much of problem for commercial vehicles and taxis..and if the carmakers go on it they could solve the design issue of where to put the tanks in passenger cars.
We should eliminate the use of natural gas for epg and convert all that to nuclear while shifting natural gas to heating and vehicles. We have lots of natural gas in NA..with more reserves every day.


10 posted on 01/24/2010 5:44:53 PM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne; All
Tell that to Australia, as they move forward with conversions with Gov't subsidies to insure a rapid payback for the car owner.

One of my Auto Gnomes told me what the added price is for off the assembly line, but that is not for here. Yes it is more. But down in AU their gasoline this summer was $4.80 American and their Gaseous fuel was 80 cents a gallon. Suplant Direct Injectors with Gaseous Direct Injectors, for even higher compression ratios or more turbo-boost for downsized engines with a nice kick.

All we need is Congress and Obongo to get off their @$$ and make it a reality.

As someone who has been reseaching this fuel for cars for over 2 years, Sarah Palin was right when she said Natural Gas is the fuel of the future...

12 posted on 01/24/2010 5:45:52 PM PST by taildragger (Palin/Mulally 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Not without trading oil imports for natural gas imports.

Or a vast drilling program after the ejection of many politicians.

It would take a couple decades, and would be better as a split between oil and gas.


15 posted on 01/24/2010 5:48:58 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

For trucks why not use steam? The only failing is you have to build up a head of steam and that takes 20 minutes. BUT Long Haul Truckers would not have a problem with this and the savings would be dramatic. There is that exploding thing and scalding to death thing (Listen to the Wreck of the old 97).


65 posted on 01/24/2010 7:59:47 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson