[Forgiven_Sinner]

Taking care of the liberals’ concerns is only half the equation. What will they do about the Blue Dog Democrats who won't vote for the Senate Bill without the Stupak amendment added in? And what about the Democrats who wish to retain their seats in the House?

Fortunately, this is Dick Morris’ opinion, who is often wrong.

[Kansas58]

Morris has been right about this Health Care stuff, most of the time.
I appreciate his work.

[Nonstatist]

What will they do about the Blue Dog Democrats who won't vote for the Senate Bill without the Stupak amendment added in

Stupak is not even a "blue dog", and he promises 10 others. But lets say its just him and Cao (the La. Republican). Then all they need is one more..

Nobody who voted against it before will come on board, so it seems unlikely she could pull this off..Plus, Morris is wrong about 85 % of the time.

[MHT]

The House D'RATS know that their re-elections are dicey, particularly in the more conservative districts that went with McCain in 2008. Some of these were specifically recruited by Emmanuel to be pseudo-conservatives in 2006 and 2008. They cannot vote the Senate bill and expect re-election--and why should they lose their jobs for a bill no one at home wants and might get torn apart by the Supreme Court anyway? Pelosi admitted Thurs. that she doesn't have the votes for this.

Morris is wrong, again. He often is.