Beck did not hammer Medina...Medina was informed ahead of the program the 9/11 Truther issue would be asked about. This was not a blindsided question. She had more opportunity to prepare than most who are asked hard questions...the fact that she would not answer directly tells us alot...indirectly she sure convinced many she is a birther by the very “dance steps “ she used to get out of it.
“Beck did not hammer Medina...Medina was informed ahead of the program the 9/11 Truther issue would be asked about. This was not a blindsided question. She had more opportunity to prepare than most who are asked hard questions...the fact that she would not answer directly tells us alot...indirectly she sure convinced many she is a birther by the very “dance steps “ she used to get out of it.”
I never accused Beck of hammering her or blindsiding her. I said his method was distracting and I was disappointed with the interview because I couldn’t tell what the hub-bub in Texas was about. Prior to the interview (he talked about Perry at length—I have no idea if this is good or bad—don’t really know anything about Perry. Seemed to imply Perry was ok.)
Beck was going on and on about Van Jones being a truther and thus it qualified for his termination. But Beck, on his TV programs pointed was that Jones was an admitted Marxist and that was his platform for a few weeks of complaining about Jones. Later it came out he was a “truther”. I can tolerate people believing in Big Foot, UFOs, trolls, being “truthers”—they’re free to believe in this stuff—but an active member of a philosophy that has an enemy position against this country is unacceptable. I just thought Beck’s position and using this over and over (Jones being a truther) was disingenuous (claiming/implying that Jones was fired for being a “truther”).
Being in Kentucky, Ron Paul’s son, Rand Paul—is running for Senate. And seems to be making strives (if not leads) in the polls. Not once has 9/11 truthers been mentioned. It’s not an issue here—nor is it relevant.