Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dick Cheney not sold on Sarah Palin presidency
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | February 14, 2010 | Jimmy Orr

Posted on 02/14/2010 10:51:45 AM PST by kingattax

Former Vice President Dick Cheney said he hasn't made up his mind who he will support in the 2012 presidential election. When asked if he thought Sarah Palin was qualified, he punted. ---

Is Sarah Palin qualified to be president? Former Vice President Dick Cheney answered that question with an artful dodge this morning when he appeared on ABC's This Week.(see video below) "I haven't made a decision yet on whom I'm going to support for president next time around," he said to host Jonathan Karl. "Whoever it is is going to have to prove themselves capable of being President of the United States."

"And those tests will come during the course of the campaigns obviously," he continued. "I think all of the prospective candidates out there have a lot of work to do if in fact they are going to persuade a majority of Americans that they are ready to take on the world's toughest job."

You didn't think you'd get a yes or no on that question, did you? Come on

VIDEO AT LINK

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; considerthesource; msm4rinos; msm4romney; msmantipalin; palin; palin2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321 next last
To: reasonisfaith

Palin campaigning for McCain really doesn’t amount to much? Really? Then why would she do it? Why would she expose herself to ridicule, and lose a great deal of the people who like her? It is all too, curious. I know that I will not vote for her if she ever runs for a national office. She lost a ton of conservatives when she went to Arizona and stood beside that, that turd that is always trying to reach across the aisle to be used by the liberals as butt paper. Good luck Sarah. Good luck.


221 posted on 02/14/2010 1:22:31 PM PST by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
Of course not. She’s a W O M A N!

ABSOLUTELY!!!

We elect a woman president, next thing you know...
THEY'LL WANT TO VOTE!!!

I don't think any of us want to see that. What's next...driving cars....(shudder)...
I need a drink.

222 posted on 02/14/2010 1:25:27 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Cheney will come around.


223 posted on 02/14/2010 1:28:26 PM PST by karnage (worn arguments and old attitudes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

I’ve met President Bush. He is certainly not an idiot.


224 posted on 02/14/2010 1:32:21 PM PST by karnage (worn arguments and old attitudes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim, I think Cheney was the glue that held the last administration together through thick and thin. I don’t say that to diminish Bush, but to acknowledge Cheney’s contributions.

I think he made the ticket more palatable. I think his sound judgment was needed at times. I think he and Bush made a good team considering their views, and I didn’t always agree with the direction that administration took. It would have been a complete disaster if it had been Bush/McCain for instance.

As for Cheney’s comments concerning the Palin question, I think they hit the right tone. He doesn’t rule her in or out. He doesn’t praise or criticize her. He defers to the election cycle, when his endorsement will matter. Now it would be premature and could cause him to have to backtrack if someone more sound came along.

For that reason I say, full speed ahead for good judgment. And if Sarah turns out to be the most sound and reasoned person in early 2012, good. I’m not convinced she will be. I’m not convinced she won’t be either.

Right now I think she has the inside track, but I do have concerns about her readiness.

IMO she needs to bump up her international credentials. You know I’m not much of an internationalist, but I do think you need to be able to exhibit a grasp of international affairs.

I also see some weakness in some areas of domestic affairs, financial markets and the like. I don’t see these as fatal, but I do want her to round out her pluses with additional understanding.

If we sign on to her too quickly, what need is there for her to grow. I want more growth.

As for Sarah’s general outlook and instincts, I like them very much. It does trouble me greatly that she would support a man for re-election that would more than likely be a thorn in her side, possibly working to defeat her more sound instincts.


225 posted on 02/14/2010 1:35:54 PM PST by DoughtyOne (God, Family, Friends, Home, Town, State, the U.S., Conservatism, Free Republic & a dollar a day...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
So, going bankrupt and costing her State millions is a weak excuse? What would you use, other than words to run the country? Words are what let us convey our positions on any subject.

As Governor, she could not call out the National Guard (of which she was CIC) to force the 10% of Alaskans who disagreed with her, into submission.

Her actions(words) got the Big Oil executives attention, and got them to the table. Granted, we still have not moved any gas from the North Slope, but it looks more likely than any time in the past.

She used words to force them to begin development on an oilfield they had been sitting on for 20+ years.

She used "words" to resume aerial wolf control to help increase game populations for The People who depend on them for subsistence.

No, words don't mean anything.

226 posted on 02/14/2010 1:40:52 PM PST by snowtigger (It ain't what you shoot, it's what you hit...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Go all woman Sarah!

Go away Hillary!
I think that one will try a comeback and that’s what scares me.


227 posted on 02/14/2010 2:00:25 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS ... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

I can’t imagine it - so that tells me Hillary just may try it. Hillary and I NEVER saw eye to eye on anything. ;)

I’m FOR America!


228 posted on 02/14/2010 2:15:10 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
It does trouble me greatly she would support a man for re-election

Well, then, looks like YOU aren't ready - to pass the loyalty test. You really do need to brush up on that! Until you are in her shoes - there is alot YOU CANNOT SEE! She's already walked the walk.

Do you always drive from the backseat?
229 posted on 02/14/2010 2:21:05 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

IF YOU can’t see the difference YOU should at least ‘keep it real’.

GO SARAH!! They are really steamed and PATRIOTS are enjoying it!! Way to go! Hi Mom!


230 posted on 02/14/2010 2:27:59 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
;-)
231 posted on 02/14/2010 2:29:21 PM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Doulos1

“It is all too, curious”

This is a strange comment.


232 posted on 02/14/2010 3:45:59 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Hey you noble leftists. If what you are doing is worth anything, it should be worth saying out loud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: crymeariver

He did not say that, he said he has not decided. Besides he looks like a social moderate.


233 posted on 02/14/2010 3:48:07 PM PST by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Thank God! Thank God thank God thank God thank God.


234 posted on 02/14/2010 3:49:05 PM PST by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

“Effectiveness is a far better comparison.”
Excellent point. Well stated.


235 posted on 02/14/2010 3:52:12 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Quit being reasonable and mature. You will drive the koolaid drinkers crazy.


236 posted on 02/14/2010 4:02:58 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I love this man. What a patriot,always putting the best interests of the Country first. Go, VP Cheney!!


237 posted on 02/14/2010 4:05:31 PM PST by La Enchiladita (wise gringa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doulos1

Keep your $hithooks off of my senator.


238 posted on 02/14/2010 4:06:32 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Being sensitive about a word is liberal.

Is no one free to speak in your presence without offending you? If so, you are a liberal!!


239 posted on 02/14/2010 4:07:47 PM PST by La Enchiladita (wise gringa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

What legal barriers prevent them?


240 posted on 02/14/2010 4:25:24 PM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson