Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Engineer_Soldier; xzins; P-Marlowe; EternalVigilance; Lesforlife; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; ...
Where in the Constitution does it state that the Federal Government has the right to usurp the State outside of the 10'th Amendments limitations?

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments make it absolutely clear that the states CANNOT make ANY LAWS that deprive a person of life without due process.

Do you believe that an individual state should be allowed to pass a law legalizing murder?

557 posted on 02/21/2010 12:18:00 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
Do you believe that an individual state should be allowed to pass a law legalizing murder?

***********************

For the record, I do not. There are some crimes that deserve and even require a federal interest.

558 posted on 02/21/2010 12:23:50 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments make it absolutely clear that the states CANNOT make ANY LAWS that deprive a person of life without due process.

Do you believe that an individual state should be allowed to pass a law legalizing murder?

These amendments bar the federal government from doing so. Remember, the Constitution (as it was originally written) places limitations on the federal government as a treaty amongst the states, and the federal government only. It places no limitations on the states individually (pre Civil War as our country was founded). That is why every state has its own constitution spelling out the limitations by the people on their state's individual powers.

Do I believe that an individual state should be allowed to pass a law legalizing murder? No. But it is a state issue. Take the death penalty: a large number of people think it's state sponsored murder. However, as our founders created the Constitution, it's left up to the state and its populace to decide this. That's also why slavery was accepted for so long after the founding of our country; it was a state issue and up to the moral intellect of its people to decide the issue within the means of their own constitution.

With that said, if a state were acting tyrannical, the people would either move to a freer state or rise up and take over its government either by force or by election, but it would still be within the state. The way the founders created our confederacy, it makes states cater to the will of its own citizens without affecting the citizenry of its neighboring states; it creates competition amongst the states to attract the greatest and brightest of citizens, yet allows them to fail (as Michigan has done) and drive the ingenuity away.

578 posted on 02/21/2010 3:46:11 PM PST by Engineer_Soldier (We need a little less Marx and a little more Madison! - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson