I think he does, a lot more than I used to give him credit for.
The US government (formerly known as We The People) has been commandeered by Wall Street. The global banking system, controlled by the Fed (who owns the Fed, by the way?) and the BIS (another totally secret organization above any law) control the world through their fake fiat money system.
If we don't work to dismantle that structure, it will be dismantled by force- by China, India, Russia, etc etc etc. It's not mathematically sustainable-- it will collapse under the weight of the $QUADRILLION in unresolved OTC derivatives.
The tea party types that so many Freepers want to bash here, know this. We want the Fed taken down one way or another. The sooner we do this, the less suffering we'll have to undergo in the long run- and the sooner we'll restore a Constitutional Republic.
The longer this thing drags out, the more likely we'll devolve into a police state- then we can kiss what's left of America goodbye.
On this ‘commandeered by Wall St.’ thingy....I’ve only had a few [dozen] finance and economics courses, and worked with the business/gov’t/finance system for a few [dozen] years, so I’ll defer to your analysis...once I figure it out. I guess I need some foundation work on the premise. Can we at least agree that most small businesses need a banker and work from there? And if we need a banker to finance the purchase of a home...same same? And since we need these bankers wouldn’t it be nice if they were successful and didn’t go under every few years, with a ‘new’ banker calling our loans? Dunno bout you, but I have enough trouble changing insurance co’s every few years, sure am glad I never had a mortgage or loan ‘called’ (tho’ I admit that when they started the revolving mortgage servicer address change thingy I was pissed). And so IF, I repeat IF, we can agree that successful banks are better than bankrupt banks, what system other than the FDIC, FSLIC and the FED would you have? Does Paul have one in mind?