Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GoCards; GOPJ; Current Occupant; Baynative; mnehrling; eeevil conservative; Repub4bush; andyk; ...

Is Scott Brown Faux us or against us?

Could be he was the Dem’s candidate all
along - masquerading as a conservative.

Same thing happening in Nevada ... a faux
tea party candidate running against Reed.

We need to be like the Borg. Learn and
absorb, never to be abused by this tactic
again.

My opinion.


422 posted on 02/23/2010 5:26:12 PM PST by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Jo Nuvark

I wouldn’t worry about Scott Brown.

He gave his reason for voting for the bill — small amount of dollars, no new taxes, and people need jobs. Don’t read too much into it.


423 posted on 02/23/2010 5:38:25 PM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

My problem with Scott Brown on this bill is that it is an extension of porkulus and is no more a “jobs” bill than the first one was. So is he a guy who just strides around flashing a nice smile, or does he read these things? If he doesn’t, if he’s not a serious legislator, then he’s just not much of a person.


425 posted on 02/23/2010 6:06:27 PM PST by Bahbah (Only dead fish go with the flow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

Nobody who sent him money is happy with his vote because he cast a ‘political’ vote and not a ‘principled’ vote.

Republican senator’s Bond, Collins, Snowe, and Voinovich also voted with the democrats, so Brown was free to cast his with them, and have his not be of any consequence.

We will never know how he would have voted, had the other four held the line.


426 posted on 02/23/2010 6:07:15 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
"Learn and absorb, never to be abused by this tactic again."

Would you prefer Reynolds or Alcoa for your hat?

427 posted on 02/23/2010 6:10:08 PM PST by AGreatPer (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

That vote was the beginning of his reelection campaign. Personally I wasn’t surprised, given the state he represents in the Senate.


438 posted on 02/24/2010 7:04:33 AM PST by Badeye (Still pretending Long Island is Manhattan, willie? (laughing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

I told you all in one of the Brown victory threads that he was a lib.


439 posted on 02/24/2010 7:22:19 AM PST by Sensei Ern (Akbar Zib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
Scott Brown won for reasons that should have been clear to him.

The Democrats are screwing up the nation.

I am very disappointed in him right now.

Still, he is better than Martha Coakley ever would have been as the “Kennedy seat” Senator.

That is not a lot, but it is something.

I am certain that this November, the message will be received loud & clear from the rest of the country. That message which is already being muffled by traditional Massachusetts politics.

441 posted on 02/24/2010 7:25:07 PM PST by Radix (What happened in Massachusetts, is going to be times 10 in a few months.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson