[fullchroma]

One less vote for 0bamacare.

He voted NO, the last go-around. The scandal leak was deliberate.

[Apparatchik]

The scandal leak was deliberate.

This seems plausible. Any chance the 'Rats have more dirt on him and this leak was a warning shot?

Someone needs to stiffen Massa's spine on this and encourage him to switch back to the GOP. If he's being blackmailed by Obama or Pelosi, this needs airing. Remember how Sestak slipped and admitted Obama's people (Rahm?) tried to bribe him to drop his Senate aspirations to become Secretary of the Navy?

[pnh102]

He voted NO, the last go-around.

Shrug. I just presume them all guilty. :)

[kiltie65]

“He coted NO, the last go around. The scandal leak was deliberate.”

How right you are. And he’s not going to complete his term, leaving Monday, so he won’t get the chance to vote NO again. He’ll be replaced by any Dem. they can get who will vote YES. This administration totally disgusts me.

[mojitojoe]

BINGO! They don’t care what they have to do to anyone, they cannot complete the coup without seizing control of health care. It is a MUST do.

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

The scandal leak was deliberate.

Yep. Pelosi and Rahm got him out of their way using a Chicago-style political hit.

[Steelers6]

Yes, he did vote no last time. But who is to say he would have voted no again. Look at Jim Mattheson from Utah whose state is probably in the top 2 or 3 in the country against this bill with percentages in the 70’s or even low 80’s. But he might be bought off with his brother getting a seat on the appelate court.

Massa’s resignation assures that they have to go thru the election process the same way that NY 23 went which took several months. That leaves the House with 431 members now and 4 vacancies. Nathan Deal must stay in the House longer now. Pelosi needs 216 to win at present.

[b4its2late]

He voted NO, the last go-around. The scandal leak was deliberate.

Yep.