Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transonic Supercritical Fuel Injection Could Improve Gasoline Engines by 50-75 Percent
Next Big Future ^ | March 3, 2010 | Staff

Posted on 03/05/2010 12:53:51 PM PST by ConservativeMind




Transonic Combustion, based in Camarillo, CA, has developed a gasoline fuel injection system that can improve the efficiency of gasoline engines by 50 to 75 percent, beating the fuel economy of hybrid vehicles. A test vehicle the size and weight of a Toyota Prius (but without hybrid propulsion) showed 64 miles per gallon for highway driving. The company says the system can work with existing engines, and costs about as much as existing high-end fuel injection.

Transonic Combustion uses supercritical-state fuel to radically shift the technological benefits of the automotive internal combustion engine This technology was featured at the ARPA-E Innovation summit and has DOE funding.

TSCi Fuel Injection achieves lean combustion and super efficiency by running gasoline, diesel, and advanced bio-renewable fuels on modern diesel engine architectures. Supercritical fluids have unusual physical properties that Transonic is harnessing for internal combustion engine efficiency. Supercritical fuel injection facilitates short ignition delay and fast combustion, precisely controls the combustion that minimizes crevice burn and partial combustion near the cylinder walls, and prevents droplet diffusion burn. Our engine control software facilitates extremely fast combustion, enabled by advanced microprocessing technology. Our injection system can also be supplemented by advanced thermal management, exhaust gas recovery, electronic valves, and advanced combustion chamber geometries.

Fuel efficiency improvements enabled by advanced combustion technologies of 50% or more for automotive engines (relative to spark-ignition engines dominating the road today in the U.S.) and 25% or more for heavy-duty truck engines (relative to today’s diesel truck engines) are possible in the next 10 to 15 years



Our fuel system efficiently supports engine operation over the full range of conditions – from stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratios at full power to lean 80:1 air-to-fuel ratios at cruise, with engine-out NOx at just 50% of comparable standard engines. Our real-time programmable control of combustion heat release results in dramatically increased efficiency.

Along with operating on gasoline, our technology can efficiently utilize fuels based on their chemical heat capacity independent of octane or cetane ratings. Thus, economical, highly functional mixtures of renewable plant products can be utilized which are not practical in either conventional spark or compression ignition engines. In dynamometer testing on current engine architectures, our technology has successfully run on gasoline, diesel, biodiesel, heptane, ethanol, and vegetable oil. Recently our engineers achieved seamless operation alternating between several different fuels on one of our customer’s engines in our Camarillo test facilities.


Supercritical Fuel Injection

Automotive Engineering International Feature - Supercritical fuel injection and combustion

Recent work by Mike Cheiky, a physicist and serial inventor/entrepreneur, is focusing on raising not only the fuel mixture’s pressure but also its temperature.

Cheiky's aim, in fact, is to generate a little-known, intermediate state of matter—a so-called supercritical (SC) fluid—which he and his co-workers at Camarillo, CA-based Transonic Combustion believe could markedly increase the fuel efficiency of next-generation power plants while reducing their exhaust emissions.

Transonic’s proprietary TSCi fuel-injection systems do not produce fuel droplets as conventional fuel delivery units do, according to Mike Rocke, Vice President of Marketing and Business Development. The supercritical condition of the fuel injected into a cylinder by a TSCi system means that the fuel mixes rapidly with the intake air which enables better control of the location and timing of the combustion process.

The novel SC injection systems, which Rocke calls “almost drop-in” units, include “a GDI-type,” common-rail system that incorporates a metal-oxide catalyst that breaks fuel molecules down into simpler hydrocarbon chains, and a precision, high-speed (piezoelectric) injector whose resistance-heated pin places the fuel in a supercritical state as it enters the cylinder.

Company engineers have doubled the fuel efficiency numbers in dynamometer tests of gas engines fitted with the company’s prototype SC fuel-injection systems, Rocke said. A modified gasoline engine installed in a 3200-lb (1451-kg) test vehicle, for example, is getting 98 mpg (41.6 km/L) when running at a steady 50 mph (80 km/h) in the lab.

The 48-employee firm is finalizing a development engine for a test fleet of from 10 to 100 vehicles, while trying to find a partner with whom to manufacture and market TSCi systems by 2014.

“A supercritical fluid is basically a fourth state of matter that’s part way between a gas and liquid,” said Michael Frick, Vice President for Engineering. A substance goes supercritical when it is heated beyond a certain thermodynamic critical point so that it refuses to liquefy no matter how much pressure is applied.

SC fluids have unique properties. For a start, their density is midway between those of a liquid and gas, about half to 60% that of the liquid. On the other hand, they also feature the molecular diffusion rates of a gas and so can dissolve substances that are usually tough to place in solution.

To minimize friction losses, the Transonic engineers have steadily reduced the compression of their test engines to between 20:1 and 16:1, with the possibility of 13:1 for gasoline engines.

Patents

Thus far 3 patents (#7444230, #7546826, #7657363) have been issued to Transonic from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office related to our technology, with another 14 patents pending.

Patent 7444230 - Fuel injector having algorithm controlled look-ahead timing for injector

The present invention provides an injector-ignition fuel injection system for an internal combustion engine, comprising an ECU controlling a heated catalyzed fuel injector for heating and catalyzing a next fuel charge, wherein the ECU uses a one firing cycle look-ahead algorithm for controlling...

Application number: 12/464,790 - INJECTOR-IGNITION FOR AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
The present invention provides a heated catalyzed fuel injector that dispenses fuel substantially exclusively during the power stroke of an internal combustion engine, wherein ignition occurs in a fast burn zone at high fuel density such that a leading surface of the fuel is completely burned...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
As some say in the comments, it sounds like it borrows a lot from diesel.
1 posted on 03/05/2010 12:53:51 PM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ping of interest.


2 posted on 03/05/2010 12:54:11 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

And it runs on water and use static electricity from the air to generate the spark for the cold fusion ignition.


3 posted on 03/05/2010 12:56:27 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (Another day, another injury, another step closer. Are you prepared?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


4 posted on 03/05/2010 1:01:34 PM PST by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I’m skeptical about some of the claims above, but interested. It sounds a lot like the technology involved in direct-injection systems out there already, but without increasing combustion ratios those are producing only incremental improvements in efficiency. Let’s see a real test engine operating in the real world against a comparable conventiona engine under the same conditions and compare fuel economy. If there’s any real promise in this I can only imagine any number of companies will be beating a path to their doors to provide funding and get a piece of it (or reserve it for their own vehicle brands). There isn’t an auto company out there today that wouldn’t like to improve efficiency by 50 to 75% without the shortcomings that come with current diesel engines (largely the expensive systems needed to deal with particulates and NOx emissions).


5 posted on 03/05/2010 1:08:17 PM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
"Recent work by Mike Cheiky, a physicist and serial inventor/entrepreneur, is focusing on raising not only the fuel mixture’s pressure but also its temperature."

I was wondering about the heat factor -- whether that will adversely impact the engine materials, durability, oil, etc.

6 posted on 03/05/2010 1:16:46 PM PST by alancarp (Calling all states: Reduce the cost of doing business and jobs will flock to your doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

More Info at

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2010/03/transonic-20100304.html#more

http://www.tscombustion.com/


7 posted on 03/05/2010 1:20:42 PM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

“A modified gasoline engine installed in a 3200-lb (1451-kg) test vehicle, for example, is getting 98 mpg (41.6 km/L) when running at a steady 50 mph (80 km/h) in the lab.”

Lets get it off the dyno and out on the freeway


8 posted on 03/05/2010 1:26:20 PM PST by twistedwrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Anyone care to guess how long it will take greenies to find a reason to oppose this?

I’m guessing 34 minutes.

I’ve come to the conclusion that the green movement will oppose any PRACTICAL new energy source or improvement in current systems.


9 posted on 03/05/2010 1:27:34 PM PST by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp; The_Victor

What are the losses due to parasite power to pressurize the gasoline to supercritical pressures/temperatures?


10 posted on 03/05/2010 1:27:50 PM PST by nuke rocketeer (File CONGRESS.SYS corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

And this was proposed in the mid 70s when we had a gas shortage. It is why today thing like over head cams and electronic fuel ignition became standard on cars.

Look the truth is they are playing the numbers on you. The one thing that is true is that if you spray a fine mist of fuel into a combustion chamber at just the right moment you will not need to worry about spark inefficiencies and missing the top of the stroke.

This will not be on any car anytime soon


11 posted on 03/05/2010 1:28:50 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
I’ve come to the conclusion that the green movement will oppose any PRACTICAL new energy source or improvement in current systems.

"Giving mankind access to cheap energy would be like giving an idiot child a machine gun." Paul Erlich.

12 posted on 03/05/2010 1:30:53 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

Yeah, I just got an urgent e-mail from Nygotu Murabe; he’s a Nigerian investments advisor, and he says he can help me get in on this before “certain corrupt petrochemical corporatations” try to disuade “smart people like yourself” from getting involved. What do you think?


13 posted on 03/05/2010 1:31:43 PM PST by Clioman (wHAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Erlich is among the most famously wrong individuals to ever write a book.


14 posted on 03/05/2010 1:32:14 PM PST by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Not to worry, the cost of fuel will increase 50 - 75% also.


15 posted on 03/05/2010 1:32:46 PM PST by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance: Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clioman
It's also about fractions, you can only divide up crude so much in certain ways, it all has to go somewhere.

That's why so much jet fuel went up refinery flares after 911, with so many jets off, pipeline and storage facilities soon ran out of room .

It's about production balance, that's the bottom line for overall fleet MPG.

It' still a good idea, but needs to be introduced slowly (to maintain balance).

16 posted on 03/05/2010 1:37:55 PM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Ford should consider bringing Transonic into itself to test feasibility and if feasible, to market in their varying car lines.


17 posted on 03/05/2010 1:40:27 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; ...

Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....

If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST just FReepmail me.....

This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....

18 posted on 03/05/2010 1:41:08 PM PST by Red Badger (Education makes people easy to lead, difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clioman

Now that really cheeses me off! Murabe promissed I would be his sole investor. I just new I couldn’t trust him. Guess I’ll settle for 50%


19 posted on 03/05/2010 1:42:48 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (Another day, another injury, another step closer. Are you prepared?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

Kewl! Say, could you loan me some money? Murabe says I’m very, very trustworthy!!


20 posted on 03/05/2010 2:39:34 PM PST by Clioman (wHAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson