[exhaustedmomma]

from that article at link:

Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, said the board's 10 Republicans had voted to "reject the most fundamental constitutional protection for religious freedom in America today: the principle that government may not disfavor or promote any religion over all others."

The Texas Freedom Network bills itself as a watchdog of the religious right.

Does that mean what I think it means? They "rejected" it as in fought against the pooh-bah crap?

[greeneyes]

“Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, said the board's 10 Republicans had voted to “reject the most fundamental constitutional protection for religious freedom in America today: the principle that government may not disfavor or promote any religion over all others.”

According to judge Napalitano, this only applied to a national religion. Massachusetts, actually had a state religion at one time. So all this garbage about the USA being a “secular” country is just misinformation.