Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutionality of Deem and Pass never Addressed by SCOTUS.
findlaw.com ^ | February 29, 1892 | SCOTUS

Posted on 03/20/2010 10:30:46 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter

Two SCOTUS cases are being bandied about as weak support for Deem and Pass:

Clinton v. City of New York (1998)
Field v. Clark (1892)
Neither deal directly with the question of "Deem and Pass", but rather with Enrolled Bills that were not exactly the same when passed in both houses.

In the 1892 case Field v. Clark :
...in regard to certain matters, the constitution expressly requires that they shall be entered on the journal. To what extent the validity of legislative action may be affected by the failure to have those matters entered on the journal we need not inquire. No such question is presented for determination.

Looks like the issue will finally be examined.

(Excerpt) Read more at caselaw.lp.findlaw.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; congress; deemandpass; deemocracy; deemocracyobamacare; lawsuit; liberalfascism; obamacare; ruling; scotus
More from the 1892 case quoting SCOTUS Justice Story:

....as Mr. Justice Story has well said, 'the object of the whole clause is to insure publicity [143 U.S. 649, 671] to the proceedings of the legislature, and a correspondent responsibility of the members to their respective constitutents. And it is founded in sound policy and deep political foresight. Intrigue and cabal are thus deprived of some of their main resources, by plotting and devising measures in secrecy. The public mind is enlightened by an attentive examination of the public measures; patriotism and integrity and wisdom obtain their due reward; and votes are ascertained, not by vague conjecture, but by positive facts. ... So long as known and open responsibility is valuable as a check or an incentive among the representatives of a free people, so long a journal of their proceedings and their votes, published in the face of the world, will continue to enjoy public favor and be demanded by public opinion.' 2 Story, Const. 840, 841.

In regard to certain matters, the constitution expressly requires that they shall be entered on the journal. To what extent the validity of legislative action may be affected by the failure to have those matters entered on the journal we need not inquire. No such question is presented for determination.

1 posted on 03/20/2010 10:30:46 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter; SE Mom; STARWISE

Bookmark and Ping! Thanks for posting this info.

Might want to ping your lists to this info.


2 posted on 03/20/2010 10:44:00 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson