Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ejdrapes
Blaming Bush is juvenile. It's like blaming McCain for being a lousy candidate, which he was. But in the end, what difference did it make? Obama won and would have beat any Republican after eight years of pistol-whipping by the media and financial debacle created by Fannie and Freddie.

Bush was the most electable Republican at the time and he was better than either Gore or Kerry. He was not a nation builder and had no international agenda but, as he always said, 9-11 changed everything. He wasn't a perfect conservative but neither was he the stupid lout that the press made him out to be.

His term is over and so are its lost opportunities. Blaming him makes the media right and I, perhaps alone, refuse to buy anything the press declares about George W. Bush.

W. Bush has said that the people who will write about him and judge him have yet to be born. Wonder how they will look back upon tonight?

33 posted on 03/21/2010 9:29:55 PM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MHT
His term is over and so are its lost opportunities. Blaming him makes the media right and I, perhaps alone, refuse to buy anything the press declares about George W. Bush.

You're not alone.

People want someone to blame, how about blaming all those who fire INTO the tent instead of firing OUT. The media couldn't have succeeded against Bush without the full help and assistance of those who claim to be on our side. If we stuck together like the dems this would be a different world.

106 posted on 03/21/2010 10:00:45 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson