There you go again! Predictably so.
The point was, no context, subtext or history can change what 1 Samuel 15: 2-3 advocates - ritual child slaughter.
OMG!
So when the Framers of our Constitution ordered in plain text that Congress shall make NO law abridging the freedom of speech, this means it was an absolute NO! No laws against obscenity, child pornography, libel, incitement to violence etc can be made.
So we need not inquire into the real interpretation of Samuel, by your lights, we simply go by the text because people who are “illiterate and uneducated” can only see it this way. Aren’t you selling yourself short here?