“And that’s about it...”
You conveniently left out a political action that could produce results in less than 12 months.
A Republican-controlled Congress could move to correct the violation of statute that occurred during the Jan 9, 2009 session of the Joint Committee called solely for the purpose of considering and accepting, or denying, the Electoral College’s certifications.
The violation occurred when the chair failed to call for Objections to any certifications, (“the...SHALL CALL for objections”)(emphasis added).
It is irrelevant that the chair was a Republican; further, nothing occurred at that session that could, or did, waive that violation.
The correction could occur via a Congressional Subcommittee charged with correcting the violation by receiving Objections to the Electoral College’s certifications.
In anticipation of objections based on the lack of constitutional eligibility, the Subcommittee would be empowered to 1) subpoena birth documents and 2) apply to the USSC for an opinion as to whether the term NBC requires two US citizen parentage.
see #150. I like it.
“And that’s about it...”
You conveniently left out a political action that could produce results in less than 12 months.
A Republican-controlled Congress could move to correct the violation of statute that occurred during the Jan 9, 2009 session of the Joint Committee called solely for the purpose of considering and accepting, or denying, the Electoral College’s certifications.
The violation occurred when the chair failed to call for Objections to any certifications, (“the...SHALL CALL for objections”)(emphasis added).
It is irrelevant that the chair was a Republican; further, nothing occurred at that session that could, or did, waive that violation.
The correction could occur via a Congressional Subcommittee charged with correcting the violation by receiving Objections to the Electoral College’s certifications.
In anticipation of objections based on the lack of constitutional eligibility, the Subcommittee would be empowered to 1) subpoena birth documents and 2) apply to the USSC for an opinion as to whether the term NBC requires two US citizen parentage.
You conveniently left out a political action that could produce results in less than 12 months.
A Republican-controlled Congress could move to correct the violation of statute that occurred during the Jan 9, 2009 session of the Joint Committee called solely for the purpose of considering and accepting, or denying, the Electoral College’s certifications.
I don't think I conveniently left it out; I don't think that such a thing is a remote possibility.
In other words, it would be like saying to me (about another subject), "You've conveniently left out the possibility that the sun might skip a day in rising this week."
I would say, "No, it' ain't ever gonna happen!" ... LOL ... And I would say the same thing about that... :-)
The violation occurred when the chair failed to call for Objections to any certifications, (“the...SHALL CALL for objections”)(emphasis added).
It is irrelevant that the chair was a Republican; further, nothing occurred at that session that could, or did, waive that violation.
Well, you'll note that no objections will be received that are not in writing and that are not received ahead of time.
Thus, by the time you get to the actual session, and nothing is in writing and nothing has been received ahead of time -- there is absolutely nothing which could be submitted at the time of the session, which would be allowed.
Therefore, it wasn't called because nothing could qualify, per those requirements, "at that time of the session".
And that's why you'll never see this happening, because it's easily verified and proven that nothing was submitted in writing ahead of time.
There can be no better recipe for a greater tyranny than we have ever known as Americans.