Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: restornu

Patton might have disagreed.


2 posted on 03/29/2010 6:27:17 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

I’m sure the Japanense would disagree.


3 posted on 03/29/2010 6:28:28 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

hey! You stole my line!


23 posted on 03/29/2010 6:48:33 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Patton was in a different war.
26 posted on 03/29/2010 6:50:10 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Agreed. To boot, there are a mass of past historical generals and leaders who would argue otherwise. Hence the theory that when you go to war or engage in a conflict, you bring and use everything within your arsenal to bring said war or conflict to a swift end....being the longer a war or conflict persists, the more chance and likelihood of increased deaths casualties. I suppose Petraeus believes that fighting with one hand tied behind your back is the best way; therefore is why he asserts that one can’t kill your way out of war?


33 posted on 03/29/2010 7:02:31 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

0bama, Mullen and Petraeus want us to have an army of sissy faggots who can’t kill their way out of a wet paper bag.


50 posted on 03/29/2010 10:04:39 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson