Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
Two final points, and then I hope never to hear from you again:

1. You started the name calling with your first post to me.

2. I would never in a million years have thought to bring up Justice Thomas in the context of this discussion. Why did you? I can only assume you're heart may not be as pure as all of your self righteous posturing would have us believe.

37 posted on 03/31/2010 3:48:08 AM PDT by Jagman (End income inequality: cut gov worker pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Jagman

Sorry I can’t let you let such false statement stands. You need to re-read the posts (as I just did). I didn’t call you a name...the only thing I stated was a statement of fact that your comment was racist. It doesn’t mean you are a racist.

So please show me where I resorted to name calling prior to your two name calling posts. And don’t worry many people resort to name calling once they lose an argument. Bill Clinton and the left did it all the time when he was being called out for his shananigans. It’s a typical method to try and “win” a lost cause. Typically you should attack the facts, but if you can’t then attack the message, and if that fails attack the person. At least by your resorting to name calling I see you admit the comment was a racist one. Thank you for making my point for me.


38 posted on 03/31/2010 6:01:32 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson