Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TXnMA

Without a legal BC we don’t even know who Obama’s legal father is.

We need both issues. We need the “natural born” requirement to be defined so secretaries of state can be held accountable for only placing eligible candidates on the ballot. But SCOTUS could use just about any criteria they want in order to define “natural born citizen” so anything that requires a judicial opinion is not an automatic slam dunk.

We do know from what the Hawaii DOH has said that Factcheck is a forgery and the best Hawaii has doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence. Any fake “original BC” that Obama comes up with has to have a very specific amendment on it, matching the communications the DOH has made so far. And that amendment renders his BC insufficient to be prima facie evidence. Obama was not born in a hospital and neither he nor his mother was seen by a Hawaii doctor within a month of the delivery.

See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/

We don’t need to be afraid of either the parentage or birth location issues. They are both important; Obama loses on both.


118 posted on 04/01/2010 11:40:31 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

We don’t need to be afraid of either the parentage or birth location issues. They are both important; Obama loses on both.

AMEN


144 posted on 04/12/2010 7:09:06 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson