Correct. The term “G.I” means Government Issue. That along with all the rules they drill into you during boot camp and afterward, mean you don’t question orders unless it is a serious matter. The BC issue is not a military matter, it is a civilian matter. Not saying it is not important, but this guy is toast if he keeps running his mouth.
What’s the proper protocol for the military to get rid of enemies within the chain of command?
Let’s suppose that Nidal Hasan was promoted to be in the chain of command and was committing treason against the US. Is there anything that the people under his command could actually do to keep their vow to defend America and the Constitution against people like Hasan?
This isn’t just a baloney issue. We’ve seen that enemies have figured out they can infiltrate our military and get promoted because of political correctness. What is our protection against this happening at all levels of the chain of command?
How do we know the enemy hasn’t infiltrated the White House? He’s already perjured himself to say he was eligible to be there, and committed forgery to make it seem like Hawaii confirms his eligibility, when in fact the Hawaii DOH has indirectly confirmed that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery and the best they have for him doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence.
That sounds to me like somebody who knew he wasn’t eligible and committed at least 2 crimes in order to violate the US Constitution. I’d call that an enemy of this nation. What do you think?
Documentation for my claims is at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
Agreed. If his concerns are so great that they won't allow him to continue following orders, he should quit and persue them as a normal citizen, not as a military member.
Being a legitimate CIC is a military matter ....... I don’t understand your point?