Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Second Amendment First
Here, here. First one to bring up this point.

Link to time line of mechanized farming in America.

http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blfarm1.htm

Rather than buying the slaves, the north should have offered discount pricing on mechanized farming equipment to southern farmers. This would have killed off slavery faster than anything else.

The reasons the south was using slaves was because, at the time, it was the cheapest way to farm. Give them a cheaper way to farm and what need would they have for slaves?

144 posted on 03/31/2010 4:20:21 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Sergio

That would have addressed the situation fully. The only trouble was, the mechanization wasn’t ready to handle things like cotton harvesting yet, and there’s never been a completely mechanized way to handle tobacco. Unless people were willing to wait another, oh, 50 years for the level of mechanization to reach the point where southern crops would really be mechanized, it would not have worked.


160 posted on 03/31/2010 4:28:14 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: Sergio
Rather than buying the slaves, the north should have offered discount pricing on mechanized farming equipment to southern farmers. This would have killed off slavery faster than anything else.

Now that's an innovative solution. And thanks for the link.

174 posted on 03/31/2010 4:36:21 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson