Lincoln fought the war to preserve the Union, in fact he said multiple times if he could preserve the Union by freeing no slaves, all slaves or some slaves he would do so.
Now its another issue as to whether Lincoln had the right to preserve the Union by force. Unfortunately the Civil War was probably unavoidable, from my study of that era the real raping of the Constitution was started in Reconstruction, then went industrial strength with both Roosevelts. When Paul first appeared on my political horizon I was quite intrigued. My first reaction was perhaps another Phil Crane type of Constitutionalist, but after several years of listening and reading some of his writings (like his newsletter) its clear he is in his "own world" and its not a rational one!
Right. People were as close-minded then as they are today.
Why should I read Shelby Foote when your lessons are so much better?
The point is that Lincoln did not want to free slaves or
abolish slavery.
He preferred waiting until he could find a general who would endure the required death toll in order to preserve the Union.
I’ve never understood the logic of those who thought slavery was wrong but killing to free them was right.
Or the logic of killing people on a genocidal scale to keep them from having independence.