Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mark was here
I think it has more to do with the South trying to sell cotton to Europe, cotton the North needed for their industry ... it was about money for the big guys ... and the little guys ended up dead.

Along with failing to develop things like industry, and shipping, and infrastructure, the south had also failed to develop anything like a financial sector. What that meant practically was that the southern planters sold very little cotton directly to Europe. Instead it went to New York brokers who had fronted them the money they needed. Those brokers sold to anyone who met their price. Northern mills could buy as much as they needed at the going rate, and didn't have to pay for the transatlantic shipping.

205 posted on 03/31/2010 4:57:41 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Didn’t the North also put some taxes / restrictions on cotton going to Europe? It is my understanding they did.


220 posted on 03/31/2010 5:02:54 PM PDT by Mark was here (Fighting for freedom is never easy, especially when your enemies are merely fighting for free stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson